Hahnel Sebastian, Rosentritt Martin, Handel Gerhard, Bürgers Ralf
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Center, 93042 Regensburg, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2009 Aug;25(8):969-75. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the surface properties of dental ceramic materials belonging to different ceramic classes, and to correlate the findings to the initial adherence of three oral streptococcal strains.
Rectangular specimens were prepared from different ceramic materials (glass/lithium disilicate glass/glass-infiltrated zirconia/partially sintered zirconia/hipped zirconia ceramic) and polished; surface roughness (Ra) was determined. Glass plates were used as a control. Specimens were incubated with phosphate-buffered saline or an artificial saliva (protein mixture; 2h, 37 degrees C). Surface free energy (gamma(t)) and its polar (gamma(p)) and disperse (gamma(d)) contribution were determined prior to and after artificial saliva exposure. Uncoated and protein-coated specimens were incubated with Streptococcus gordonii DSMZ 6777, Streptococcus oralis DSMZ 20068 or Streptococcus sanguinis DSMZ 20068 suspension for 2.5h at 37 degrees C (n=15 for each treatment and strain). Adherent streptococci were quantified fluorometrically.
The lithium disilicate glass ceramic showed the highest values for Ra; the lowest values were found for the glass ceramic, the partially sintered zirconia and the hipped zirconia ceramic. Protein coating caused a significant increase in gamma(t) and gamma(p), but not in the control material. The control material showed higher values for streptococcal adhesion than all ceramic materials. After protein coating, only slight and random differences in streptococcal adhesion were found between the various ceramic materials.
Dental ceramic materials show differences in terms of Ra, gamma(t) and initial streptococcal adhesion; however, correlations between surface properties and streptococcal adhesion were poor.
本体外研究旨在调查不同陶瓷种类的牙科陶瓷材料的表面特性,并将研究结果与三种口腔链球菌菌株的初始黏附情况相关联。
从不同陶瓷材料(玻璃/二硅酸锂玻璃/玻璃渗透氧化锆/部分烧结氧化锆/热压氧化锆陶瓷)制备矩形样本并进行抛光;测定表面粗糙度(Ra)。使用玻璃板作为对照。样本在磷酸盐缓冲盐水或人工唾液(蛋白质混合物;2小时,37摄氏度)中孵育。在人工唾液暴露前后测定表面自由能(γ(t))及其极性(γ(p))和色散(γ(d))成分。未涂层和蛋白质涂层的样本在37摄氏度下与戈登链球菌DSMZ 6777、口腔链球菌DSMZ 20068或血链球菌DSMZ 20068悬浮液孵育2.5小时(每种处理和菌株n = 15)。通过荧光法对黏附的链球菌进行定量。
二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的Ra值最高;玻璃陶瓷、部分烧结氧化锆和热压氧化锆陶瓷的Ra值最低。蛋白质涂层导致γ(t)和γ(p)显著增加,但对照材料未出现这种情况。对照材料显示出比所有陶瓷材料更高的链球菌黏附值。蛋白质涂层后,各种陶瓷材料之间在链球菌黏附方面仅发现轻微且随机的差异。
牙科陶瓷材料在Ra、γ(t)和初始链球菌黏附方面存在差异;然而,表面特性与链球菌黏附之间的相关性较差。