MacKenzie Simon, Ribas Laia, Pilarczyk Maciej, Capdevila Davinia Morera, Kadri Sunil, Huntingford Felicity A
Unitat de Fisiologia Animal, Department de Biología Cel.lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de Biociencies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005314. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
Individuals of many vertebrate species show different stress coping styles and these have a striking influence on how gene expression shifts in response to a variety of challenges.
This is clearly illustrated by a study in which common carp displaying behavioural predictors of different coping styles (characterised by a proactive, adrenaline-based or a reactive, cortisol-based response) were subjected to inflammatory challenge and specific gene transcripts measured in individual brains. Proactive and reactive fish differed in baseline gene expression and also showed diametrically opposite responses to the challenge for 80% of the genes investigated.
Incorporating coping style as an explanatory variable can account for some the unexplained variation that is common in gene expression studies, can uncover important effects that would otherwise have passed unnoticed and greatly enhances the interpretive value of gene expression data.
许多脊椎动物物种的个体表现出不同的应激应对方式,这些方式对基因表达如何响应各种挑战而发生变化具有显著影响。
一项研究清楚地说明了这一点。在该研究中,对表现出不同应对方式行为预测指标(以基于肾上腺素的主动反应或基于皮质醇的被动反应为特征)的鲤鱼进行炎症刺激,并测量个体大脑中的特定基因转录本。主动型和被动型鱼类在基线基因表达上存在差异,并且在所研究的80%的基因中,它们对刺激的反应也完全相反。
将应对方式作为一个解释变量,可以解释基因表达研究中常见的一些无法解释的变异,能够揭示那些否则会被忽视的重要影响,并大大提高基因表达数据的解释价值。