MacEachern Sean, McEwan John, Goddard Mike
Primary Industries Research Victoria, Animal Genetics and Genomics, Attwood, VIC, Australia.
BMC Genomics. 2009 Apr 24;10:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-177.
The Bovinae subfamily incorporates an array of antelope, buffalo and cattle species. All of the members of this subfamily have diverged recently. Not surprisingly, a number of phylogenetic studies from molecular and morphological data have resulted in ambiguous trees and relationships amongst species, especially for Yak and Bison species. A partial phylogenetic reconstruction of 13 extant members of the Bovini tribe (Bovidae, Bovinae) from 15 complete or partially sequenced autosomal genes is presented.
We identified 3 distinct lineages after the Bovini split from the Boselaphini and Tragelaphini tribes, which has lead to the (1) Buffalo clade (Bubalus and Syncerus species) and a more recent divergence leading to the (2) Banteng, Gaur and Mithan and (3) Domestic cattle clades. A fourth lineage may also exist that leads to Bison and Yak. However, there was some ambiguity as to whether this was a divergence from the Banteng/Gaur/Mithan or the Domestic cattle clade. From an analysis of approximately 30,000 sites that were amplified in all species 133 sites were identified with ambiguous inheritance, in that all trees implied more than one mutation at the same site. Closer examination of these sites has identified that they are the result of ancient polymorphisms that have subsequently undergone lineage sorting in the Bovini tribe, of which 53 have remained polymorphic since Bos and Bison species last shared a common ancestor with Bubalus between 5-8 million years ago (MYA).
Uncertainty arises in our phylogenetic reconstructions because many species in the Bovini diverged over a short period of time. It appears that a number of sites with ambiguous inheritance have been maintained in subsequent populations by chance (lineage sorting) and that they have contributed to an association between Yak and Domestic cattle and an unreliable phylogenetic reconstruction for the Bison/Yak clade. Interestingly, a number of these aberrant sites are in coding sections of the genome and their identification may have important implications for studying the neutral rate of mutation at nonsynonymous sites. The presence of these sites could help account for the apparent contradiction between levels of polymorphism and effective population size in domesticated cattle.
牛亚科包含一系列羚羊、水牛和牛类物种。该亚科的所有成员最近才分化。毫不奇怪,一些基于分子和形态数据的系统发育研究得出的系统发育树以及物种间的关系并不明确,尤其是牦牛和野牛物种。本文展示了基于15个完整或部分测序的常染色体基因对牛族(牛科,牛亚科)13个现存成员进行的部分系统发育重建。
在牛族从牛薮羚族和薮羚族分化后,我们识别出3个不同的谱系,这导致了(1)水牛分支(水牛属和非洲水牛属物种),以及更近的分化产生了(2)爪哇野牛、白肢野牛和大额牛分支,还有(3)家牛分支。可能还存在第四个谱系,它通向野牛和牦牛。然而,关于这是从爪哇野牛/白肢野牛/大额牛分支还是家牛分支分化出来的,存在一些不明确之处。通过对所有物种中扩增出的约30000个位点进行分析,识别出133个位点具有不明确的遗传模式,即所有的系统发育树都暗示在同一位置发生了不止一次突变。对这些位点的进一步研究表明,它们是古代多态性的结果,这些多态性随后在牛族中经历了谱系分选,其中53个自牛属和野牛属物种与水牛属物种在500万至800万年前(百万年前)最后一个共同祖先以来一直保持多态性。
我们的系统发育重建中出现不确定性是因为牛族中的许多物种在短时间内发生了分化。似乎一些具有不明确遗传模式的位点偶然地(谱系分选)在随后的种群中得以保留,并且它们导致了牦牛和家牛之间的关联以及野牛/牦牛分支不可靠的系统发育重建。有趣的是,这些异常位点中有许多位于基因组的编码区,它们的识别可能对研究非同义位点的中性突变率具有重要意义。这些位点的存在有助于解释家养牛中多态性水平和有效种群大小之间明显的矛盾。