Atalayer Deniz, Rowland Neil E
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2250, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2009 Aug 4;98(1-2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.016. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
Several field and experimental studies have investigated the behavioral economics of food intake. In the laboratory, operant behavior has been used to emulate cost and to generate demand functions that express the relationship between the price of food and amount consumed. There have been few such studies of motivated food seeking and intake in mice, and none has reported demand functions. Using albino (CD1) male mice, the present study compares food intake and meal patterns across a series of ratio cost schedules. The first experiment examined unit price. A closed economy was used in which the mice were in the test chambers for 23 h/day and earned all of their food via either a nose poke or lever press response under fixed (FUP5, FUP10, FUP25, FUP50), variable (VUP10, VUP20, VUP50), and progressive (PUP1.25, PUP1.5, PUP1.75) unit prices. Mice were run for 4 days at each cost. There were no consistent differences between the first and last day indicating that behavioral adjustments to schedule changes occurred rapidly. When averaged across all price schedules, mice in the nose poke group consumed more food than their lever press counterparts but the overall shapes of the demand curves did not differ between the two operant responses, with intake decreasing as price increased. The number of meals taken per day differed between two meal-defining criteria that we applied, and there were some differences between the types of unit price schedule. In the second experiment, approach cost in the form of nose poke responses was required to activate a response device (lever) on which a fixed unit price for food was in force. These approach and unit costs were varied systematically. Meal number decreased, and meal size increased, with increasing approach cost even though nose pokes accounted for only a small fraction of the total response activity. Thus, meal patterns in mice are sensitive to approach cost while total amount consumed is more sensitive to unit price. These data are discussed in terms of the concept of foraging cost as either a unitary or a multidimensional variable.
多项实地研究和实验研究探讨了食物摄入的行为经济学。在实验室中,操作性行为已被用于模拟成本并生成需求函数,以表达食物价格与摄入量之间的关系。针对小鼠中有动机的食物寻找和摄入的此类研究较少,且尚无研究报告需求函数。本研究使用白化(CD1)雄性小鼠,比较了一系列比率成本计划下的食物摄入量和进食模式。第一个实验研究了单位价格。采用封闭经济模式,小鼠每天在测试室中待23小时,通过单次鼻触或按压杠杆反应获取所有食物,单位价格分为固定(FUP5、FUP10、FUP25、FUP50)、可变(VUP10、VUP20、VUP50)和累进(PUP1.25、PUP1.5、PUP1.75)三种。每种成本下小鼠实验4天。第一天和最后一天之间没有一致的差异,表明对计划变化的行为调整迅速发生。在所有价格计划下进行平均时,鼻触组的小鼠比按压杠杆组的小鼠消耗更多食物,但两种操作性反应的需求曲线总体形状并无差异,摄入量随价格增加而减少。我们应用的两种进餐定义标准下,每天的进餐次数有所不同,单位价格计划类型之间也存在一些差异。在第二个实验中,需要以鼻触反应的形式付出接近成本来激活一个反应装置(杠杆),该杠杆上食物的单位价格是固定的。这些接近成本和单位成本被系统地改变。尽管鼻触仅占总反应活动的一小部分,但随着接近成本的增加,进餐次数减少,进餐量增加。因此,小鼠的进餐模式对接近成本敏感,而总摄入量对单位价格更敏感。本文根据觅食成本作为单一或多维变量的概念对这些数据进行了讨论。