Acher Charles W, Wynn Martha
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, Wisc. 53792-7375, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2009 May;49(5):1117-24; discussion 1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.074.
To demonstrate that a modern theory of paraplegia prevention in thoracoabdominal aortic (TAAA) surgery is primarily non-anatomic and derives from experimentally validated interventions that prolong the ischemic tolerance, reduce reperfusion injury, and enhance the collateral perfusion of the spinal cord with or without assisted circulation.
Using an accurate predictive model (r(2) > 0.95) for paraplegia risk we studied the effects of protective strategies in 82 clinical series reporting more than 15,000 patients treated from 1985 to 2008. The observed/expected (O/E) ratios were calculated for each series and the results were grouped by technique. The effect of interventions such as spinal fluid drainage (SFD), systemic hypothermia, epidural cooling, and naloxone on O/E ratios were studied. We analyzed changes in O/E ratios from Era 1 (1985 to 1997) to Era 2 (1997 to 2008) and within treatment techniques over time.
The mean O/E ratio for paraplegia for all patients declined from 1.13 in Era 1 to 0.26 in Era 2. Adding SFD to patients treated with assisted circulation (AC) decreased the O/E ratio from 1.03 to 0.24 (P < .0001). Adding SFD to patients treated with aortic clamping without AC (XCL) decreased O/E from 0.91 to 0.23 (P = .0013). O/E for hypothermic arrest (HA) declined from 0.42 to 0.14 with SFD. The addition of SFD to AC, XCL, and HA accounted for most of the decline in O/E between Eras. Other factors which played a less defined but important role in the decline in O/E ratios were attention to higher mean arterial pressures (MAPs), more hypothermia, and neurochemical protection.
Paraplegia causation is anatomic but paraplegia prevention is physiologic (non-anatomic). We demonstrate that by using hypothermia, SFD, and increasing MAP, clinicians had similar improvements in paraplegia, reducing O/E deficit ratios from 1.03 to as low as 0.16, with or without intercostal reimplantation, and whether or not assisted circulation was used. Understanding the fundamental principles of paraplegia prevention and how to apply protective strategies leads to a reduction in paralysis in clinical series with or without the use of assisted circulation. This modern theory of paraplegia has significant implications for the rapidly advancing field of TAAA repair with branched endografts where the same principles apply.
证明胸腹主动脉(TAAA)手术中截瘫预防的现代理论主要是非解剖学的,源于经过实验验证的干预措施,这些措施可延长缺血耐受时间、减少再灌注损伤,并在有或没有辅助循环的情况下增强脊髓的侧支灌注。
我们使用一个准确的截瘫风险预测模型(r²>0.95),研究了1985年至2008年期间82个临床系列中超过15000例患者的保护策略效果。计算每个系列的观察值/预期值(O/E)比率,并按技术对结果进行分组。研究了诸如脑脊液引流(SFD)、全身低温、硬膜外降温及纳洛酮等干预措施对O/E比率的影响。我们分析了从第1阶段(1985年至1997年)到第2阶段(1997年至2008年)以及随着时间推移不同治疗技术中O/E比率的变化。
所有患者截瘫的平均O/E比率从第1阶段的1.13降至第2阶段的0.26。在接受辅助循环(AC)治疗的患者中添加SFD可使O/E比率从1.03降至0.24(P<0.0001)。在未接受AC而采用主动脉钳夹(XCL)治疗的患者中添加SFD可使O/E从0.91降至0.23(P = 0.0013)。对于低温停循环(HA),添加SFD后O/E从0.42降至0.14。在AC、XCL和HA中添加SFD是两个阶段之间O/E下降的主要原因。其他在O/E比率下降中作用不太明确但很重要的因素包括对更高平均动脉压(MAP)的关注、更低体温以及神经化学保护。
截瘫的病因是解剖学的,但截瘫的预防是生理性的(非解剖学的)。我们证明,通过使用低温、SFD和提高MAP,临床医生在截瘫预防方面取得了类似的改善,无论有无肋间动脉再植入以及是否使用辅助循环,O/E缺陷比率都从1.03降至低至0.16。理解截瘫预防的基本原理以及如何应用保护策略可减少临床系列中无论是否使用辅助循环情况下的瘫痪发生率。这种现代截瘫理论对采用分支型内移植物的TAAA修复这一快速发展的领域具有重大意义,同样的原则也适用于该领域。