Adhikari Prakash
Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, TU Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 4972, Maharagjung, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jun;73(6):853-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
The objective of this study is to compare the results of two different techniques in removing nasal leech infestation.
This prospective study was carried out in 40 patients attending Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, TU Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, with the history suggestive of nasal leech infestation. Patients enrolled between April 2004 and December 2008 were studied. Patients were arranged randomly into two groups. In the first group of patients, anterior rhinoscopy was done and suction was used to remove the leech from nasal cavity. While in second group, water was poured into the kidney tray and adjusted 1cm below the nasal vestibule. As soon as the leech was seen in the nasal vestibule coming towards the water, they were catched with artery forceps. Both groups were compared in the following items: time taken to remove the leech, bleeding status, pain assessment and patient's/caretaker's satisfaction. Unpaired t test was applied to compare the time taken in removing leeches in both groups.
In the first group of patients using suction, the mean duration of removal of leech was 18.25 min while in second group of patients, it was 30.25 min. Bleeding and pain was present in the first group of patients. All children were not satisfied with this technique in first group of patients. Around 70% of the patients wanted an easier option to remove the leech from nasal cavity.
Wait and watch policy (keeping the water in kidney tray just below the nasal vestibule) is a better technique because of less pain and less blood loss with full satisfaction to the patients and caretakers, though it is more time consuming.
本研究的目的是比较两种不同技术去除鼻腔水蛭感染的效果。
这项前瞻性研究在加德满都TU教学医院耳鼻喉科和头颈外科就诊的40例有鼻腔水蛭感染病史的患者中进行。对2004年4月至2008年12月期间纳入的患者进行研究。患者被随机分为两组。第一组患者进行前鼻镜检查并用吸引器从鼻腔中吸出水蛭。而第二组患者,将水倒入肾形盘并调整至鼻前庭下方1厘米处。一旦在鼻前庭看到水蛭朝向水移动,就用动脉钳将其捕获。对两组在以下项目进行比较:去除水蛭所需时间、出血情况、疼痛评估以及患者/护理人员的满意度。应用非配对t检验比较两组去除水蛭所需的时间。
第一组使用吸引器的患者,去除水蛭的平均持续时间为18.25分钟,而第二组患者为30.25分钟。第一组患者出现出血和疼痛。第一组所有儿童对该技术不满意。大约70%的患者希望有更简便的方法从鼻腔中去除水蛭。
等待观察策略(将肾形盘中的水置于鼻前庭下方)是一种更好的技术,因为疼痛较轻、失血较少,患者和护理人员完全满意,尽管耗时较长。