• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术中电热血管封闭系统与内镜夹的比较。

Comparison of the electrothermal vessel-sealing system versus endoclip in laparoscopic appendectomy.

作者信息

Aydogan Fatih, Saribeyoglu Kaya, Simsek Osman, Salihoglu Ziya, Carkman Sinan, Salihoglu Tamer, Karatas Adem, Baca Bilgi, Kucuk Ozan, Yavuz Nihat, Pekmezci Salih

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Jun;19(3):375-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0368.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2008.0368
PMID:19397389
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various techniques have been used for the division of mesoappendix, such as endoloops, endoscopic linear cutting staplers, an electrothermal vessel-sealing system (LigaSure), the Harmonic Scalpel, clips, and bipolar coagulation. In the present study, LigaSure and an endoclip were compared in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included patients who underwent LA for acute appendicitis at Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Emergency Unit (Istanbul, Turkey) between May 2003 and April 2007. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the mesoappendix dissection device: LigaSure and endoclip groups. The main outcome measures (e.g., operating time, conversion rate, hospital stay, postoperative complications, etc.) were then compared.

RESULTS

LA was performed in 280 patients with acute appendicitis. LigaSure and endoclips were used in 127 and 153 patients, respectively. The mean operative times were 41 and 54 minutes in the LigaSure and endoclip groups, respectively. Conversions to open rates were found to be 9.4% (12 patients) in the LigaSure and 11.1% (17 patients) in endoclip groups. No statistically significant differences regarding hospital stay or complications were found, whereas significant differences were observed in surgical time and conversion rate.

CONCLUSION

The use of LigaSure facilitates the dissection of mesoappendix and shortens the operation time in LA. We believe that LigaSure is a safe, useful tool for mesoappendix dissection.

摘要

背景

已采用多种技术来分离阑尾系膜,如内镜圈套器、内镜直线切割吻合器、电热血管闭合系统(LigaSure)、超声刀、钛夹和双极电凝。在本研究中,对LigaSure和内镜钛夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)中的应用进行了比较。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2003年5月至2007年4月在土耳其伊斯坦布尔大学塞拉哈帕夏医学院急诊科因急性阑尾炎接受LA的患者。根据阑尾系膜分离器械将患者分为两组:LigaSure组和内镜钛夹组。然后比较主要结局指标(如手术时间、中转率、住院时间、术后并发症等)。

结果

280例急性阑尾炎患者接受了LA。LigaSure组和内镜钛夹组分别有127例和153例患者。LigaSure组和内镜钛夹组的平均手术时间分别为41分钟和54分钟。LigaSure组的中转开腹率为9.4%(12例患者),内镜钛夹组为11.1%(17例患者)。在住院时间或并发症方面未发现统计学显著差异,而在手术时间和中转率方面观察到显著差异。

结论

LigaSure的使用有助于阑尾系膜的分离,并缩短LA的手术时间。我们认为LigaSure是一种用于阑尾系膜分离的安全、有用的工具。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the electrothermal vessel-sealing system versus endoclip in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中电热血管封闭系统与内镜夹的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Jun;19(3):375-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0368.
2
Lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendectomy in children: comparison of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision), bipolar coagulation (LigaSure), and thermal fusion technology (MiSeal).小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜及阑尾根部的侧向热损伤:超声刀(Ultracision)、双极电凝(LigaSure)和热融合技术(MiSeal)的比较
J Surg Res. 2017 May 15;212:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System.使用LigaSure血管闭合系统的腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005 Aug;15(4):353-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.353.
4
The effects of LigaSure on the laparoscopic management of acute appendicitis: "LigaSure assisted laparoscopic appendectomy".LigaSure在急性阑尾炎腹腔镜治疗中的效果:“LigaSure辅助腹腔镜阑尾切除术”
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Aug;19(4):333-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a99288.
5
Intracorporeal knotting versus metal endoclip application for the closure of the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis.在单纯性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术中,体内打结与使用金属夹闭合阑尾残端的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Apr;22(3):231-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0335. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
6
Energy Devices for Clipless-Sutureless Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Utility and Safety.无夹闭免打结腹腔镜阑尾切除术的能量设备:有效性和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 27;58(11):1535. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111535.
7
Comparison of intracorporeal knot-tying suture (polyglactin) and titanium endoclips in laparoscopic appendiceal stump closure: a prospective randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾残端闭合中体内打结缝线(聚乙醇酸)与钛夹的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Jun;22(3):226-31. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824f25cd.
8
Comparison of the Electrothermal Bipolar Sealing System (LigaSure) Versus Endoloop in Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy.电热双极密封系统(LigaSure)与 Endoloop 在小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Oct;32(10):1126-1129. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0841. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.
10
Comparison of various methods of mesoappendix dissection in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜不同解剖方法的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Jan;24(1):28-31. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0374. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Appropriate LigaSure™ Device to Transect the Appendix-A Comparison between 5 mm and 10 mm Laparoscopic Devices in an Ex Vivo Trial.评价适用于切断阑尾的 LigaSure™ 设备-5mm 和 10mm 腹腔镜设备在离体试验中的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 11;59(5):927. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050927.
2
Energy Devices for Clipless-Sutureless Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Utility and Safety.无夹闭免打结腹腔镜阑尾切除术的能量设备:有效性和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 27;58(11):1535. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111535.
3
Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic appendectomy: A stepwise systematic review.
腹腔镜阑尾切除术的循证外科:一项逐步进行的系统评价。
Surg Open Sci. 2021 Aug 26;6:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2021.08.001. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Comparison of Ultrasonic Dissection and Suture Ligation for Mesoappendix in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜超声刀离断与丝线结扎的比较
Cureus. 2021 Apr 6;13(4):e14316. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14316.
5
Histopathological Response and Adhesion Formation After Omentectomy with Ultrasonic Energy, Bipolar Sealing, and Suture Ligation.超声能量、双极电凝和缝合结扎大网膜切除术后的组织病理学反应及粘连形成
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):799-804. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-1005-2. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
6
Early results of pediatric appendicitis after adoption of diagnosis-related group-based payment system in South Korea.韩国采用诊断相关分组付费系统后小儿阑尾炎的早期结果。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Nov 24;8:503-9. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S95937. eCollection 2015.
7
Single incision cholecystectomy using a clipless technique with LigaSure in a resource limited environment: The Bahamas experience.在资源有限环境下使用LigaSure无夹技术进行单切口胆囊切除术:巴哈马的经验。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;11:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.04.034. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
A brief review of laparoscopic appendectomy: the issues and the evidence.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的简要回顾:问题与证据。
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Mar;15(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0656-2. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
9
Closure of the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用 LigaSure 血管密封系统闭合胆囊管。
World J Surg. 2011 Jan;35(1):212-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0813-9.