Suppr超能文献

新辅助治疗后侵袭性直肠腺癌行直肠切除术后的淋巴结清扫:是否适用相同标准?

Lymph node harvest after proctectomy for invasive rectal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy: does the same standard apply?

作者信息

Wang Hao, Safar Bashar, Wexner Steven, Zhao Ronghua, Cruz-Correa Marcia, Berho Mariana

机构信息

Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida 33331, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):549-57. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819eb872.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Recent reports indicate that neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduces the lymph node harvest of rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to interpret the lymph node harvest in this setting based on the primary tumor response.

METHODS

All patients undergoing proctectomy were included. Three variables were used as indicators of primary tumor response: ypT stage, tumor size, and tumor regression grade.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2007, 237 patients were identified: 157 in the neoadjuvant therapy group and 80 in the nonneoadjuvant therapy group. Neoadjuvant therapy significantly reduced the number of lymph nodes harvested (P = 0.011). Compared with the nonneoadjuvant group, there were significantly fewer lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant early T stage group (P = 0.001), small tumor size group (P = 0.003), and low tumor regression grade group (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the nonneoadjuvant group and the neoadjuvant advanced T stage (P = 0.664), large tumor (P = 0.815), and high tumor regression grade groups (P = 0.566).

CONCLUSION

The current standard of lymph node harvest should be applied to patients with poorly responding primary tumors after neoadjuvant therapy. However, a new standard may be necessary to define the adequate number of lymph nodes for tumors that respond well to neoadjuvant therapy.

摘要

目的

近期报告表明,新辅助治疗可显著减少直肠癌的淋巴结清扫数量。本研究的目的是基于原发肿瘤反应来解读这种情况下的淋巴结清扫情况。

方法

纳入所有接受直肠切除术的患者。使用三个变量作为原发肿瘤反应的指标:ypT分期、肿瘤大小和肿瘤退缩分级。

结果

1998年至2007年,共确定237例患者:新辅助治疗组157例,非新辅助治疗组80例。新辅助治疗显著减少了清扫的淋巴结数量(P = 0.011)。与非新辅助治疗组相比,新辅助治疗早期T分期组(P = 0.001)、肿瘤小尺寸组(P = 0.003)和低肿瘤退缩分级组(P < 0.001)的淋巴结明显较少。然而,非新辅助治疗组与新辅助治疗晚期T分期组(P = 0.664)、大肿瘤组(P = 0.815)和高肿瘤退缩分级组(P = 0.566)之间无显著差异。

结论

目前的淋巴结清扫标准应适用于新辅助治疗后原发肿瘤反应较差的患者。然而,对于对新辅助治疗反应良好的肿瘤,可能需要一个新的标准来确定足够的淋巴结数量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验