• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤位置对腹腔镜直肠癌手术后短期和长期结局的影响:倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Influence of tumor location on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study.

机构信息

Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07255-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-07255-9
PMID:32795280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7427716/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer (LRC) compared with mid/high rectal cancer (M/HRC).

METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic resection with curative intent were retrospectively reviewed between 2009 and 2015. After matched 1:1 by using propensity score analysis, perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared between LRC and M/HRC groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent factors of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Of 373 patients who met the criteria for inclusion, 198 patients were matched for the analysis. Laparoscopic surgery for LRC required longer operative time (P<0.001) and more blood loss volume (P = 0.015) compared with M/HRC, and the LRC group tended to have a higher incidence of postoperative complications (16.2% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.082). There was no significant difference in local recurrence between the two groups (9.1% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.251), whereas distant metastasis was inclined to be more frequent in LRC patients compared with M/HRC (21.2% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.086). The LRC group showed significantly inferior 5-year OS (77.0% vs. 86.4%, P = 0.033) and DFS (71.2% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.017) compared with the M/HRC group. Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor location was an independent predictor of DFS (HR = 2.305, 95% CI 1.203-4.417, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Tumor location of the rectal cancer significantly affected the clinical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic surgery, and it was an independent predictor of DFS.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估腹腔镜下低位直肠癌(LRC)与中高位直肠癌(M/HRC)切除术后的短期和长期结果。

方法

回顾性分析了 2009 年至 2015 年间接受腹腔镜根治性切除术的直肠癌患者的资料。通过倾向性评分分析进行 1:1 匹配后,比较 LRC 组和 M/HRC 组的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。采用多变量分析确定总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的独立因素。

结果

符合纳入标准的 373 例患者中,198 例患者进行了匹配分析。与 M/HRC 相比,LRC 组的腹腔镜手术操作时间更长(P<0.001),出血量更多(P=0.015),术后并发症发生率也较高(16.2% vs. 8.1%,P=0.082)。两组局部复发率无显著差异(9.1% vs. 4.0%,P=0.251),但 LRC 组远处转移的发生率高于 M/HRC 组(21.2% vs. 12.1%,P=0.086)。LRC 组的 5 年 OS(77.0% vs. 86.4%,P=0.033)和 DFS(71.2% vs. 86.2%,P=0.017)均显著低于 M/HRC 组。多变量分析表明,肿瘤位置是 DFS 的独立预测因素(HR=2.305,95%CI 1.203-4.417,P=0.012)。

结论

直肠癌的肿瘤位置显著影响腹腔镜手术后的临床和肿瘤学结果,是 DFS 的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0293/7427716/51c754a71e2b/12885_2020_7255_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0293/7427716/beb792c67769/12885_2020_7255_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0293/7427716/51c754a71e2b/12885_2020_7255_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0293/7427716/beb792c67769/12885_2020_7255_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0293/7427716/51c754a71e2b/12885_2020_7255_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of tumor location on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study.肿瘤位置对腹腔镜直肠癌手术后短期和长期结局的影响:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07255-9.
2
Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.低位前切除术治疗直肠癌吻合口漏的长期结果。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07109-4.
3
Feasibility of relatively low neoadjuvant radiation doses for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.局部进展期直肠癌行相对低剂量新辅助放疗的可行性:倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2019 Oct;2(5):e1188. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1188. Epub 2019 Jun 2.
4
Comparative Outcomes of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Selective Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Clinical Stage T3N0 Low and Mid Rectal Cancer.临床分期为T3N0的低位和中位直肠癌患者术前放化疗与选择性术后放化疗的比较结果
J Invest Surg. 2019 Nov;32(7):679-687. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1469696. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer.倾向评分匹配分析腹腔镜与开放手术治疗非转移性直肠癌的效果。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Dec 1;22(12):3967-3975. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.3967.
6
Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.新辅助放化疗后机器人与腹腔镜中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的长期肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1728-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5165-6. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage I rectal cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗Ⅰ期直肠癌:长期肿瘤学结果。
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):646-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1846-z.
8
Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort.德国直肠癌患者的腹腔镜手术与开放手术:一项基于10年大规模人群队列的短期和长期结果
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1132-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06861-4. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
Long-term outcomes of surgery alone versus surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for early T3 rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis.早期T3直肠癌单纯手术与术前放化疗后手术的长期疗效:一项倾向评分分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(12):e6362. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006362.
10
Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.与腹腔镜切除术相比,机器人切除术是直肠癌的一个良好预后因素:使用倾向评分匹配的长期生存分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Mar;60(3):266-273. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000770.

引用本文的文献

1
Dentate line invasion is a risk factor for locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis following abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective cohort study based on 1854 cases.齿状线侵犯是直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术后局部区域复发和远处转移的危险因素:一项基于1854例病例的单中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 30;25(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14001-6.
2
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients.超越生存:直肠癌患者生活质量的全面综述
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Dec;40(6):527-537. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00745.0106. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Added value of DCER-features to clinicopathologic model for predicting metachronous metastases in rectal cancer patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased lymph node yield indicates improved survival in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗治疗局部进展期直肠癌,增加淋巴结检出数可提高生存率。
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(10):4615-4625. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2372. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
2
Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort.德国直肠癌患者的腹腔镜手术与开放手术:一项基于10年大规模人群队列的短期和长期结果
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1132-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06861-4. Epub 2019 May 30.
3
Distinct Prognosis of High Versus Mid/Low Rectal Cancer: a Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.
DCER 特征对预测直肠癌患者异时性转移的临床病理模型的增值作用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 May;49(5):1341-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04153-z. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
4
Dentate line invasion as a predictive factor of poor distant relapse-free survival in locally advanced lower rectal cancer with anal sphincter involvement.齿状线侵犯是局部晚期低位直肠癌合并肛门括约肌侵犯患者远处无复发生存不良的预测因素。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):1196. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10299-8.
5
A refined prediction of early recurrence combining tumor deposits in patients with resected rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma.结合直肠黏液腺癌切除患者的肿瘤沉积物对早期复发进行精细化预测。
Surg Today. 2023 Jul;53(7):762-772. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02613-5. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.直肠癌新辅助治疗反应的基因组和转录组决定因素。
Nat Med. 2022 Aug;28(8):1646-1655. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01930-z. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
7
Pathologic-Based Nomograms for Predicting Overall Survival and Disease-Free Survival Among Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.基于病理的列线图预测局部晚期直肠癌患者的总生存期和无病生存期
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 22;13:1777-1789. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S296593. eCollection 2021.
高位与中/低位直肠癌的不同预后:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1474-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04072-1. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Metastatic pattern and new primary tumours after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in rectal cancer.直肠癌新辅助治疗和手术前后的转移模式和新原发肿瘤。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;20(12):O326-O334. doi: 10.1111/codi.14427. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Rectal Cancer and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Resection.新辅助化疗和切除术后病理完全缓解的直肠癌患者辅助化疗与总生存的关系。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;4(7):930-937. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5597.
6
Association of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Overall Survival in Patients With Rectal Cancer and Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Resection.辅助化疗与新辅助化疗和切除术后病理完全缓解的直肠癌患者总生存的关系。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;4(7):938-943. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0231.
7
The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer.肿瘤距肛缘距离对直肠癌患者根治性切除术后临床管理和结局的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec;21(12):2056-2065. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3581-0. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Large, Multicenter, Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study in Japan.开腹与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位进展期直肠癌:日本一项大型多中心倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):318-324. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002329.
9
Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity.经提肌外腹会阴切除术与标准腹会阴切除术:对切除标本质量和术后发病率的影响。
World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):2160-2167. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3963-1.
10
Understanding the factors associated with reduction in the number of lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients treated by neoadjuvant treatment.了解新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者淋巴结数量减少的相关因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jun;32(6):925-927. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2747-7. Epub 2016 Dec 29.