Schaufel M A, Nordrehaug J E, Malterud K
Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, PO Box 7804, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
Heart. 2009 Aug;95(15):1245-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.164657. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
To explore doctor-patient interactions and decision-making processes before high-risk cardiac surgery or intervention with special attention to existential challenges.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a qualitative study with data drawn from doctor-patient dialogues preceding high-risk procedures. The study setting was the cardiac department of a university hospital with 24-hour emergency service. We recruited a purposive sample of 10 patients and eight doctors. The patients were categorised as high-risk patients in accordance with EuroSCORE and established angiographic procedural high-risk criteria. Transcripts from the dialogues were analysed with systematic text condensation, inspired by discourse analysis.
Accounts of doctor-patient interaction reflecting existential aspects of the decision-making process.
The main existential concerns identified in the doctor-patient interactions were surviving uncertainty, negotiating responsibility and trusting the doctor's proficiency. When handling uncertainty, doctors imparted complex information about risk, warnings and recommendations, while patients sought and trusted the doctors' advice. Though the decisions were made in asymmetrical power relations, they were based on a shared responsibility discussed and defined throughout the dialogues. The patients expressed a profound confidence in the doctor's ability to get them through the high-risk treatment and give the best help possible.
Uncertainty, mortality, responsibility and trust are fundamental existential issues concerning both patients and doctors before high-risk procedures, with an impact on decision-making processes. Increasing focus on underlying existential conditions, ethical reasoning and power relations in medical education may improve the quality of shared decision-making and informed consent related to high-risk treatment.
探讨高危心脏手术或介入治疗前的医患互动及决策过程,特别关注生存挑战。
设计、背景与参与者:我们进行了一项定性研究,数据取自高危手术前的医患对话。研究地点为一家提供24小时急诊服务的大学医院心脏科。我们采用目的抽样法选取了10名患者和8名医生。根据欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)和既定的血管造影手术高危标准,将患者归类为高危患者。受话语分析启发,运用系统文本浓缩法对对话记录进行分析。
反映决策过程中生存层面的医患互动描述。
医患互动中确定的主要生存担忧包括应对不确定性、协商责任以及信任医生的专业能力。在应对不确定性时,医生传达了有关风险、警告和建议的复杂信息,而患者则寻求并信任医生的建议。尽管决策是在权力不对称的关系中做出的,但它们基于整个对话中讨论和界定的共同责任。患者对医生帮助他们度过高危治疗并提供最佳帮助的能力表达了深深的信心。
不确定性、死亡率、责任和信任是高危手术前患者和医生面临的基本生存问题,对决策过程有影响。在医学教育中更多地关注潜在的生存状况、伦理推理和权力关系,可能会提高与高危治疗相关的共同决策和知情同意的质量。