Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Int Braz J Urol. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):158-63. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382009000200005.
To prospectively evaluate the outcome of using a two-suture technique for the vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
Two groups of 50 patients each underwent nerve-sparing RRP for localized prostate cancer by one surgeon. In one group, the vesicourethral anastomosis was performed using 2 Vicryl 2-0 stitches placed at the 3- and 9-o'clock positions and in the other group 6 Vicryl 2-0 stitches were placed at the 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10- and 12-o'clock positions. The intraoperative and perioperative parameters analyzed were time to perform the VUA, time to remove the drain and hospitalization. The rate of incontinence, anastomotic stricture and erectile function were included in the outcome analysis.
The anastomotic time differed statistically between the 2 groups (mean 3.3 minutes for the 2-suture group and 10.5 minutes for the 6-suture group, p < 0.0001) with similar periods of drain removal (mean 3.12 days for the 2-suture group and 3.45 days for the 6-suture group; p = 0.13) and hospitalization (mean 4.66 days for the 2-suture group and 5.3 days for the 6-suture group; p = 0.09). The functional outcome was excellent for the 2-suture group with no patient suffering from incontinence or anastomotic strictures 1 year postoperatively, while in the 6-suture group there were 2 patients (4%) suffering from incontinence (2 underwent sling procedure) and 1 patient suffered from anastomotic stricture.
The low number of sutures in the 2-suture VUA technique reduces operating times, does not influence perioperative and intraoperative parameters and results in excellent functional outcome.
前瞻性评估在根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)中使用双缝线技术进行膀胱尿道吻合术(VUA)的结果。
一位外科医生对 50 例局限性前列腺癌患者分别进行了神经保留的 RRP。在一组中,采用 2 根 Vicryl 2-0 缝线在 3 点和 9 点位置进行膀胱尿道吻合术,在另一组中,采用 6 根 Vicryl 2-0 缝线在 2 点、4 点、6 点、8 点、10 点和 12 点位置进行膀胱尿道吻合术。分析术中及围手术期参数包括 VUA 手术时间、引流管去除时间和住院时间。尿失禁、吻合口狭窄和勃起功能纳入结局分析。
两组吻合时间有统计学差异(2 缝线组平均 3.3 分钟,6 缝线组平均 10.5 分钟,p < 0.0001),引流管去除时间相似(2 缝线组平均 3.12 天,6 缝线组平均 3.45 天;p = 0.13),住院时间相似(2 缝线组平均 4.66 天,6 缝线组平均 5.3 天;p = 0.09)。2 缝线组功能结局极佳,术后 1 年无患者发生尿失禁或吻合口狭窄,而 6 缝线组有 2 例(4%)患者发生尿失禁(2 例接受吊带手术),1 例患者发生吻合口狭窄。
2 缝线 VUA 技术中的缝线数量较少,可缩短手术时间,不影响围手术期和术中参数,并获得良好的功能结果。