Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Medical Statistics, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):980-991. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is a crucial step during radical prostatectomy (RP). Generally, either a continuous (CS) or an interrupted suture (IS) is used. However, there is no clear evidence if one technique is superior to the other.
This study aimed to provide a systematic overview and comparison between IS and CS for the VUA during RP.
The study was conducting according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic data base search (Pubmed, Embase, and Central) was performed. Outcomes included catheterization time, extravasation, anastomotic time, length of hospital stay, continence, and development of strictures.
A total of 2021 studies were retrieved, of which nine studies (1475 patients) were included in analysis. Results showed a shorter catheterization time (2.06 d; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-3.57; p=0.007), anastomotic time (6.39min; 95% CI: 3.68-9.10; p<0.001), and a lower rate of extravasation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.26-4.43; p<0.007) in favor of CS. There were no differences between groups concerning length of hospital stay (0.40 d; 95% CI: -1.41-2.20; p=0.670) or continence at 3 mo (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.83-1.44; p=0.540), 6 mo (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.67-1.61; p=0.870) or 12 mo (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.92-2.24; p=0.110), respectively. The incidence of urethral strictures was not different between the techniques (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.42-2.40; p=1.000). The quality of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool was rated as low.
This meta-analysis showed advantages of CS for catheterization time, anastomotic time, and rate of extravasation without compromising other parameters. Although CS seems to offer favorable results, its technical challenge in open RP and the generally low quality of data makes a clear recommendation impossible.
Continuous and interrupted suturing are safe suture techniques for the vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy. The choice of the suture technique should be based on surgeon's experience and technical approach.
PROSPERO: CRD42017076126.
在根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中,尿道膀胱吻合术(VUA)是一个关键步骤。通常使用连续(CS)或间断缝合(IS)。然而,目前尚无明确证据表明哪种技术更优。
本研究旨在对 RP 中 VUA 的 IS 和 CS 进行系统的综述和比较。
研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行。对 Pubmed、Embase 和 Central 进行了系统的数据库检索。结果包括导尿管留置时间、漏尿、吻合时间、住院时间、尿控和狭窄发展。
共检索到 2021 项研究,其中 9 项研究(1475 例患者)纳入分析。结果显示 CS 组的导尿管留置时间(2.06 天;95%置信区间[CI]:0.56-3.57;p=0.007)、吻合时间(6.39 分钟;95%CI:3.68-9.10;p<0.001)更短,漏尿发生率(比值比[OR]:2.36;95%CI:1.26-4.43;p<0.007)更低。两组在住院时间(0.40 天;95%CI:-1.41-2.20;p=0.670)或 3 个月(OR:1.09;95%CI:0.83-1.44;p=0.540)、6 个月(OR:1.04;95%CI:0.67-1.61;p=0.870)或 12 个月(OR:1.43;95%CI:0.92-2.24;p=0.110)的尿控率方面无差异。两种技术的尿道狭窄发生率无差异(OR:1.00;95%CI:0.42-2.40;p=1.000)。根据 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation 工具的证据质量评价为低。
本荟萃分析显示 CS 在导尿管留置时间、吻合时间和漏尿率方面具有优势,而不会影响其他参数。尽管 CS 似乎具有良好的效果,但它在开放性 RP 中的技术挑战以及数据质量普遍较低,使得无法明确推荐。
在根治性前列腺切除术期间,连续缝合和间断缝合都是安全的尿道膀胱吻合缝合技术。缝合技术的选择应基于外科医生的经验和技术方法。
PROSPERO:CRD42017076126。