Suppr超能文献

比较四种颜色的 IS6110-fAFLP 与经典的 IS6110-RFLP 在西班牙巴塞罗那市检测近期传播的能力。

Comparison of four-colour IS6110-fAFLP with the classic IS6110-RFLP on the ability to detect recent transmission in the city of Barcelona, Spain.

机构信息

S. de Microbiología, CDB, H. Clínico de Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009 May;89(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 May 1.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the IS6110-RFLP (RFLP) results obtained in a previous epidemiological study in the city of Barcelona, Spain [Borrell S, Espanol M, Orcau A, Tudo G, March F, Cayla JA, et al. Factors associated with differences between conventional contact tracing and molecular epidemiology in study of tuberculosis transmission and analysis in the city of Barcelona, Spain. J Clin Microbiol 2009 Jan;47(1):198-204.] with the results obtained with IS6110-fAFLP, [Thorne N, Evans JT, Smith EG, Hawkey PM, Gharbia S, Arnold C. An IS6110-targeting fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism alternative to IS6110-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA fingerprinting. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007 Oct;13(10):964-70.] on the ability to detect recent transmission. fAFLP was applied to DNA samples of RFLP clustered strains, with and without known epidemiological links, with the additional inclusion of four nucleotide-specific fluorophores to further increase the discrimination of the fragments obtained. Four-colour fAFLP was performed on 123 RFLP clustered strains with no epidemiological link (NELC) and on 28 epidemiologically linked RFLP clustered (ELC) strains grouped into 48 and 13 clusters respectively. Clustering results obtained by the two methods were highly congruent in ELC strains with fAFLP allocating 92.3% of the ELCs. For the NELCs, RFLP results were confirmed in 39/48 (81.2%) of fAFLP-clusters with 0-1 different fragments and 9/48 (18.8%) differed in 2-4 fragments, which are considered genetically related but not recently transmitted. In conclusion, overestimation of recent tuberculosis transmission can occur because of the inaccurate analysis of RFLP results. Four-colour fAFLP allows us to differentiate between recent transmission strains and epidemiologically unrelated but genetically related strains.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较先前在西班牙巴塞罗那市进行的一项流行病学研究中获得的 IS6110-RFLP(RFLP)结果[Borrell S, Espanol M, Orcau A, Tudo G, March F, Cayla JA, 等。与传统接触者追踪和分子流行病学在西班牙巴塞罗那市结核病传播研究和分析中的差异相关的因素。J Clin Microbiol 2009 年 1 月;47(1):198-204.]与使用 IS6110-fAFLP 获得的结果,[Thorne N, Evans JT, Smith EG, Hawkey PM, Gharbia S, Arnold C. 一种替代 IS6110-限制片段长度多态性的 IS6110 靶向荧光扩增片段长度多态性方法,用于分枝杆菌结核 DNA 指纹图谱分析。Clin Microbiol Infect 2007 年 10 月;13(10):964-70.]在检测近期传播的能力上。fAFLP 应用于 RFLP 聚类菌株的 DNA 样本,包括有和没有已知流行病学联系的样本,并额外包含四个核苷酸特异性荧光团,以进一步增加获得的片段的区分度。四色 fAFLP 对 123 株无流行病学联系(NELC)的 RFLP 聚类菌株和 28 株流行病学联系的 RFLP 聚类(ELC)菌株进行了检测,分别分为 48 个和 13 个聚类。两种方法在 ELC 菌株中的聚类结果高度一致,fAFLP 将 92.3%的 ELC 菌株归为同一类。对于 NELC,RFLP 结果在 fAFLP 聚类的 39/48(81.2%)中得到了确认,有 0-1 个不同的片段,9/48(18.8%)在 2-4 个片段上存在差异,这些差异被认为是遗传上相关但不是近期传播的。总之,由于 RFLP 结果的不准确分析,可能会高估近期结核病的传播。四色 fAFLP 可以区分近期传播的菌株和流行病学上无关联但遗传上相关的菌株。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验