Suppr超能文献

小儿癫痫发作和癫痫分类:为何重要或是否重要?

Pediatric seizure and epilepsy classification: why is it important or is it important?

作者信息

Troester Matthew, Rekate Harold L

机构信息

Barrow Neurologic Institute, University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA.

出版信息

Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2009 Mar;16(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2009.01.003.

Abstract

The classification of seizures and epilepsy is a divisive (no pun intended) topic. Debate ranges from how to classify seizures and epilepsy to whether a classification is needed at all. The classification of seizures and epilepsy in the pediatric population, specifically in the neonatal age group, differs from similar classifications in the adult population. To date, the most workable classification documents are the 1981 Classification of Seizures and the 1989 Classification of the Epilepsies from the International League Against Epilepsy. Subsequently, alternative classifications and schemes have been proposed but not universally accepted. Some pediatric-specific classifications, again with particular emphasis on classifying seizures and epilepsy in the neonatal population, have also been proposed. This review examines these classifications and attempts to analyze their pediatric-specific components in terms of applicability to the pediatric population and for their utility for pediatric physician-scientists and health care providers.

摘要

癫痫发作和癫痫的分类是一个存在分歧的(绝非双关)话题。争论范围涵盖从如何对癫痫发作和癫痫进行分类到是否根本需要进行分类。儿科人群,特别是新生儿年龄组的癫痫发作和癫痫分类,与成人人群的类似分类有所不同。迄今为止,最可行的分类文件是国际抗癫痫联盟的1981年癫痫发作分类和1989年癫痫分类。随后,有人提出了替代分类和方案,但未被普遍接受。也有人提出了一些针对儿科的分类,再次特别强调对新生儿人群的癫痫发作和癫痫进行分类。本综述考察了这些分类,并试图从对儿科人群的适用性以及对儿科医师科学家和医疗保健提供者的实用性方面分析其儿科特定组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验