Department of Pediatric Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Epilepsia. 2013 Apr;54(4):726-32. doi: 10.1111/epi.12111. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
Accurate classification of epileptic seizures, epilepsies, and epilepsy syndromes is mandatory in both clinical practice and epilepsy research. In 2010, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) proposed a new classification scheme. The aim of this study is to determine whether application of this new classification for epileptic seizures and epilepsies has improved interobserver agreement compared to the classification schemes used previously.
Three pediatric neurologists working in different university hospitals retrospectively classified seizures and epilepsies of 80 children (165 seizures) referred to the University Center Utrecht, based on anonymized data, according to the newly proposed (2010) as well as the old (1981/1989) ILAE classification schemes. We determined interobserver agreement of the application of both ILAE classifications with kappa statistics.
Interobserver agreement of the new classification for seizures and epilepsies is comparable to that of previous classifications. There is substantial agreement on the newly introduced etiologic axis.
Introduction of the new epilepsy classification has not substantially improved interobserver agreement. This study shows which items cause considerable interobserver disagreement and therefore need specification.
在临床实践和癫痫研究中,准确地对癫痫发作、癫痫和癫痫综合征进行分类是强制性的。2010 年,国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)提出了一种新的分类方案。本研究旨在确定与以前使用的分类方案相比,应用这种新的癫痫发作和癫痫分类方案是否提高了观察者间的一致性。
三位在不同大学附属医院工作的儿科神经科医生根据匿名数据,按照新提出的(2010 年)和旧的(1981/1989 年)ILAE 分类方案,对乌得勒支大学中心的 80 名儿童(165 次癫痫发作)的癫痫发作和癫痫进行回顾性分类。我们使用kappa 统计来确定两种 ILAE 分类的应用的观察者间一致性。
新的癫痫发作和癫痫分类的观察者间一致性与以前的分类相当。在新引入的病因轴上存在实质性的一致性。
新的癫痫分类的引入并没有显著提高观察者间的一致性。本研究显示了哪些项目导致了相当大的观察者间分歧,因此需要进一步说明。