• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期肝细胞癌行肝切除术是否合理?464例患者的观察性研究结果

Is liver resection justified in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma? Results of an observational study in 464 patients.

作者信息

Ruzzenente Andrea, Capra Franco, Pachera Silvia, Iacono Calogero, Piccirillo Gianluca, Lunardi Marta, Pistoso Stefano, Valdegamberi Alessandro, D'Onofrio Mirko, Guglielmi Alfredo

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Division of General Surgery A, GB Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona Medical School, Piazzale LA Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jul;13(7):1313-20. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0903-x. Epub 2009 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-009-0903-x
PMID:19418103
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The role of liver resection in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (multinodular or with macroscopic vascular involvement) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of surgical resection compared to other therapeutic modalities in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Four hundred sixty four patients with HCC observed from 1991 to 2007 were included in the study. All the patients were evaluated for the treatment of HCC in relation to the severity of liver impairment and tumor stage. All the patients included in the study had no evidence of distant metastases.

RESULTS

Median follow up time for surviving patients was 25 months (range 1-155). Two-hundred and eighty-three patients were in Child-Pugh class A, 161 in class B, and 20 in class C. Two-hundred and seventy-one patients had single HCC, 121 patients had two or three HCCs, and 72 more than three HCCs. One-hundred and thirty-six patients (29.3%) were submitted to liver resection (LR), 232 (50.0%) to local ablative therapies (LAT) (ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, chemoembolization), eight (1.7%) to liver transplantation (LT), and 88 (19%) to supportive therapy (ST). Median survival time for all patients was 36 months (95% CI 24-36). Median survival time was 57 months for LR, 30 months for LAT, and 8 months for ST, with a 5-year survival of 47%, 20%, and 2.5%, respectively (p = 0.001). Actuarial 5-year survival for patients submitted to LT was 75%. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with multiple HCCs compared to single HCC, with median survival times of 39, 16, and 11 months for patients with a single HCC, with two to three HCCs, and with more than three HCCs, respectively (p = 0.01). Survival for patients with single HCC was significantly longer in patients submitted to LR compared to LAT and ST with median survival times of 57, 37, and 14 months, respectively (p = 0.02). Also, in patients with multinodular HCCs (2-3 HCCs) LR showed the best results with a median survival time of 58 months compared to 22 and 8 months for LAT and ST (p = 0.01). In patients with more than three HCCs, LR did not show different results compared to LAT and ST. Seventy-three patients had evidence of macroscopic vascular involvement; median survival in this subgroup of patients was significantly shorter compared to patients without vascular involvement, 10 and 36 months, respectively. Survival for patients with macroscopic vascular involvement submitted to LR or LAT was significant longer compared to ST, with mean survivals of 27, 30, and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the surgery can achieve good results in patients with single HCC and good liver function. Also, patients with multinodular HCCs (two to three nodules) could benefit from LR where survival is longer than after LAT or ST. In patients with more than three HCCs, LR have similar results of LAT. Macroscopic vascular invasion is a major prognostic factor, and the LR is justified in selected patients, where it can allow good long-term results compared to ST.

摘要

背景与目的

肝切除术在晚期肝细胞癌(多结节或伴有肉眼可见血管侵犯)中的作用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估手术切除与其他治疗方式相比在晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的作用。

方法

本研究纳入了1991年至2007年间观察的464例HCC患者。根据肝功能损害程度和肿瘤分期对所有患者进行HCC治疗评估。纳入研究的所有患者均无远处转移证据。

结果

存活患者的中位随访时间为25个月(范围1 - 155个月)。283例患者为Child-Pugh A级,161例为B级,20例为C级。271例患者为单发性HCC,121例患者有2个或3个HCC,72例患者有3个以上HCC。136例患者(29.3%)接受了肝切除术(LR),232例(50.0%)接受了局部消融治疗(LAT)(乙醇注射、射频消融、化疗栓塞),8例(1.7%)接受了肝移植(LT),88例(19%)接受了支持治疗(ST)。所有患者的中位生存时间为36个月(95%可信区间24 - 36个月)。LR组的中位生存时间为57个月,LAT组为30个月,ST组为8个月,5年生存率分别为47%、20%和2.5%(p = 0.001)。接受LT患者的精算5年生存率为75%。与单发性HCC患者相比,多发性HCC患者的总生存期明显缩短,单发性HCC、2 - 3个HCC和3个以上HCC患者的中位生存时间分别为39个月、16个月和11个月(p = 0.01)。与LAT和ST相比,接受LR治疗的单发性HCC患者的生存期明显更长,中位生存时间分别为57个月、37个月和14个月(p = 0.02)。同样,在多结节HCC(2 - 3个HCC)患者中,LR显示出最佳结果,中位生存时间为58个月,而LAT和ST分别为22个月和8个月(p = 0.01)。在有3个以上HCC的患者中,LR与LAT相比未显示出不同结果。73例患者有肉眼可见血管侵犯证据;该亚组患者的中位生存期与无血管侵犯患者相比明显缩短,分别为10个月和36个月。与ST相比,接受LR或LAT治疗的有肉眼可见血管侵犯患者的生存期明显更长,平均生存期分别为27个月、30个月和12个月(p = 0.01)。

结论

本研究表明,手术可在肝功能良好的单发性HCC患者中取得良好效果。此外,多结节HCC(2 - 3个结节)患者可从LR中获益,其生存期长于LAT或ST后。在有3个以上HCC的患者中,LR与LAT结果相似。肉眼可见血管侵犯是一个主要的预后因素,在选定患者中LR是合理的,与ST相比它可获得良好的长期结果。

相似文献

1
Is liver resection justified in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma? Results of an observational study in 464 patients.晚期肝细胞癌行肝切除术是否合理?464例患者的观察性研究结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jul;13(7):1313-20. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0903-x. Epub 2009 May 6.
2
Surgical resection versus local ablation for HCC on cirrhosis: results from a propensity case-matched study.肝硬化肝癌的手术切除与局部消融治疗:一项倾向病例匹配研究结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Feb;16(2):301-11; discussion 311. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1745-x. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
3
Implication of microscopic and macroscopic vascular invasion for liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.微观和宏观血管侵犯对肝细胞癌患者肝切除的影响。
Dig Surg. 2014;31(3):204-9. doi: 10.1159/000365257. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
4
Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas within the Milan criteria.米兰标准内小肝细胞癌的手术切除与射频消融治疗对比
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(3):359-66. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0069-7. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
5
Repeat radiofrequency ablation provides survival benefit in patients with intrahepatic distant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.重复射频消融术对肝细胞癌肝内远处复发患者的生存有益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;104(11):2747-53. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.414. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
6
Living donor liver transplantation or resection for Child-Pugh A hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria.对于符合米兰标准的多发性结节Child-Pugh A级肝细胞癌患者,进行活体供肝肝移植或肝切除术。
Transpl Int. 2014 Jun;27(6):562-9. doi: 10.1111/tri.12297. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
7
Role of surgical resection for multiple hepatocellular carcinomas.外科切除术治疗多个肝细胞癌的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 21;19(3):366-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.366.
8
High CD44s expression is associated with the EMT expression profile and intrahepatic dissemination of hepatocellular carcinoma after local ablation therapy.高 CD44s 表达与 EMT 表达谱有关,并与局部消融治疗后肝癌的肝内播散有关。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Apr;20(4):429-34. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0580-0.
9
Prognostic factors of disease-free and overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing partial hepatectomy in curative intent.根治性意向下接受部分肝切除术的肝细胞癌患者无病生存和总生存的预后因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Nov;403(7):851-861. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1715-9. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
10
The 10-year Survival Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma 5 cm or Smaller: Primary versus Recurrent HCC.单发 5cm 或以下肝癌射频消融治疗的 10 年生存分析:原发性与复发性 HCC。
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):458-469. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021200153. Epub 2021 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver transplantation vs liver resection in HCC: promoting extensive collaborative research through a survival meta-analysis of meta-analyses.肝细胞癌肝移植与肝切除术的比较:通过荟萃分析的生存荟萃分析促进广泛的合作研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 18;14:1366607. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1366607. eCollection 2024.
2
Surgical resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma and those beyond BCLC: systematic review with proposed management algorithm.手术切除治疗大肝癌和巴塞罗那分期 C 期肝癌以外的肝癌:系统综述与提出的治疗方案算法。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Apr 12;408(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02881-w.
3
Preoperative Predictors of Early Recurrence After Liver Resection for Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Neither multiple tumors nor portal hypertension are surgical contraindications for hepatocellular carcinoma.多发性肿瘤和门静脉高压均不是肝细胞癌的手术禁忌证。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Jun;134(7):1908-16. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.091. Epub 2008 Mar 8.
2
Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and recent advances.肝细胞癌:当前的治疗与最新进展
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2008 Jun;7(3):237-57.
3
Future perspectives for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的未来展望
多灶性肝细胞癌肝切除术后早期复发的术前预测因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1106-1112. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05592-1. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the BCLC: are multinodular disease, portal hypertension, and portal system invasion real contraindications?超出巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期(BCLC)标准的肝细胞癌肝切除术:多结节病变、门静脉高压和门静脉系统侵犯真的是禁忌证吗?
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Dec;13(6):3123-3134. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-833.
5
Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.评价多灶性肝细胞癌的最佳治疗方法:倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 7;28(29):3981-3993. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3981.
6
Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma-Western versus Eastern attitude.肝细胞癌的外科治疗——西方与东方的态度
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(Suppl 3):S245-S260. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2018.12.28.
7
Rethinking the Barcelona clinic liver cancer guidelines: Intermediate stage and Child-Pugh B patients are suitable for surgery?重新思考巴塞罗那临床肝癌指南:中期和 Child-Pugh B 患者适合手术吗?
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 7;27(21):2784-2794. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i21.2784.
8
A Pre-Operative Prognostic Score for Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Underwent Resection.接受手术切除的晚期肝细胞癌患者的术前预后评分
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 26;11:569515. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.569515. eCollection 2021.
9
Significantly different expression levels of microRNAs associated with vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma and their prognostic significance after surgical resection.与肝癌血管侵犯相关的 microRNAs 的表达水平存在显著差异及其在手术切除后的预后意义。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0216847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216847. eCollection 2019.
10
Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Liver Resection for Binodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.多中心队列研究:肝切除治疗双叶型肝细胞肝癌的长期生存结果。
Oncologist. 2019 Aug;24(8):e730-e739. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0898. Epub 2019 May 24.
HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(4):206-13. doi: 10.1080/13651820310016779.
4
Treatment of large and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.大肝癌及进展期肝癌的治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Apr;15(4):979-85. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9727-7. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
5
Report of the 17th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan.日本第 17 次原发性肝癌全国随访调查报告。
Hepatol Res. 2007 Sep;37(9):676-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00119.x.
6
Effects of location and extension of portal vein tumor thrombus on long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.门静脉癌栓的位置及延伸对肝细胞癌手术治疗长期疗效的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jul;13(7):940-6. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.08.007. Epub 2006 May 23.
7
Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: Implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.肿瘤大小可预测血管侵犯和组织学分级:对肝细胞癌手术治疗选择的意义。
Liver Transpl. 2005 Sep;11(9):1086-92. doi: 10.1002/lt.20472.
8
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: prognostic parameters.肝硬化肝细胞癌的肝移植:预后参数
Transplant Proc. 2005 May;37(4):1693-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.143.
9
Resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的切除术与肝移植术
Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25(2):181-200. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871198.
10
Is hepatic resection for large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma justified? Results from a multi-institutional database.肝切除术治疗大肝癌或多结节肝细胞癌是否合理?多机构数据库的结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 May;12(5):364-73. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Mar 31.