• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于符合米兰标准的多发性结节Child-Pugh A级肝细胞癌患者,进行活体供肝肝移植或肝切除术。

Living donor liver transplantation or resection for Child-Pugh A hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria.

作者信息

Jiang Li, Liao Anque, Wen Tianfu, Yan Lunan, Li Bo, Yang Jiayin

机构信息

Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2014 Jun;27(6):562-9. doi: 10.1111/tri.12297. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1111/tri.12297
PMID:24606007
Abstract

The optimum primary treatment strategy for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with multiple nodules remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with that of liver resection (LR) for early Child-Pugh A HCC patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria. From January 2007 to July 2012, 67 of 375 patients with early HCC in our centre fulfilled the inclusion criteria (group LDLT, n = 34 versus group LR, n = 33). Patient and tumour characteristics, operative data, postoperative course and outcomes were analysed retrospectively. The postoperative mortality and rate of major complications were similar in both groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS; 76.5% vs. 51.2%, P = 0.046) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; 72.0% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.000) were better in group LDLT than that in group LR. The 5-year OS and RFS were similar between patients with tumours located in the same lobe (TSL) and those in the different lobes (TDL) after LDLT, whereas the 5-year RFS was better in patients with tumours in TSL (30.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.012) after LR. In conclusion, primary LDLT might be the optimum treatment for early HCC patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria.

摘要

对于早期肝细胞癌(HCC)合并多个结节的患者,最佳的初始治疗策略仍不明确。我们旨在比较活体肝移植(LDLT)与肝切除术(LR)对符合米兰标准的早期Child-Pugh A级HCC合并多个结节患者的治疗效果。2007年1月至2012年7月,我们中心375例早期HCC患者中有67例符合纳入标准(LDLT组,n = 34;LR组,n = 33)。对患者和肿瘤特征、手术数据、术后病程及结局进行回顾性分析。两组术后死亡率和主要并发症发生率相似。LDLT组的5年总生存率(OS;76.5%对51.2%,P = 0.046)和无复发生存率(RFS;72.0%对19.8%,P = 0.000)均优于LR组。LDLT术后,肿瘤位于同一肝叶(TSL)的患者与肿瘤位于不同肝叶(TDL)的患者5年OS和RFS相似,而LR术后TSL患者的5年RFS更好(30.6%对0%,P = 0.012)。总之,对于符合米兰标准的早期HCC合并多个结节的患者,初次LDLT可能是最佳治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Living donor liver transplantation or resection for Child-Pugh A hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple nodules meeting the Milan criteria.对于符合米兰标准的多发性结节Child-Pugh A级肝细胞癌患者,进行活体供肝肝移植或肝切除术。
Transpl Int. 2014 Jun;27(6):562-9. doi: 10.1111/tri.12297. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
2
Outcome after partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular cancer within the Milan criteria.米兰标准范围内行部分肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的结果。
Br J Surg. 2011 Sep;98(9):1292-300. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7583. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
3
Younger age and presence of macrovascular invasion were independent significant factors associated with poor disease-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation.在接受活体肝移植的肝细胞癌患者中,较年轻的年龄和存在大血管侵犯是与无病生存期不佳相关的独立显著因素。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):516-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.032.
4
Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的活体供肝肝移植
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(6):1713-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.05.033.
5
Living-donor liver transplantation associated with higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence than deceased-donor liver transplantation.活体供肝移植与死亡供肝移植相比,肝癌复发率更高。
Transplantation. 2014 Jan 15;97(1):71-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a68953.
6
Section 5. Further expanding the criteria for HCC in living donor liver transplantation: when not to transplant: SNUH experience.第 5 节:进一步扩大活体肝移植中 HCC 的标准:何时不移植:SNUH 经验。
Transplantation. 2014 Apr 27;97 Suppl 8:S20-3. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000446269.20934.d3.
7
Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation for early irresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.活体供体与尸体供体肝移植治疗早期不可切除肝细胞癌
Br J Surg. 2007 Jan;94(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5528.
8
Primary versus salvage living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of microvascular invasion on survival.肝细胞癌患者初次与挽救性活体肝移植:微血管侵犯对生存的影响
Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):487-93. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.11.009.
9
Effectiveness of locoregional therapy before living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who meet the Milan criteria.符合米兰标准的肝细胞癌患者在活体肝移植前进行局部区域治疗的有效性。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.067.
10
Treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: salvage transplantation, repeated resection, or radiofrequency ablation?复发性肝细胞癌的治疗策略:挽救性移植、再次切除还是射频消融?
Liver Transpl. 2013 Apr;19(4):411-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.23605. Epub 2013 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and indications for liver transplantation or hepatic resection.肝细胞癌患者的生存分析及肝移植或肝切除的指征
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02899-5.
2
Surgical treatment strategies for multifocal hepatocellular carcinomas.多灶性肝细胞癌的手术治疗策略
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Dec 1;13(6):1071-1076. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-408. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
3
Liver transplantation vs liver resection in HCC: promoting extensive collaborative research through a survival meta-analysis of meta-analyses.
肝细胞癌肝移植与肝切除术的比较:通过荟萃分析的生存荟萃分析促进广泛的合作研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 18;14:1366607. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1366607. eCollection 2024.
4
Liver resection versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria based on estimated microvascular invasion risks.基于估计的微血管侵犯风险,对米兰标准内的肝细胞癌进行肝切除与肝移植的比较
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Jun 26;11:goad035. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad035. eCollection 2023.
5
Liver resection versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a meta-analysis of 18,421 patients.米兰标准内肝细胞癌的肝切除术与肝移植术对比:18421例患者的荟萃分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2022 Feb;11(1):78-93. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-350.
6
The Treatment Effect of Liver Transplantation versus Liver Resection for HCC: A Review and Future Perspectives.肝癌肝移植与肝切除的治疗效果:综述与未来展望
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 24;13(15):3730. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153730.
7
Anatomical sites (Takasaki's segmentation) predicts the recurrence-free survival of hepatocellular carcinoma.解剖部位(高崎分类)预测肝癌的无复发生存率。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01275-3.
8
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Patients with Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas Meeting the Milan Criteria: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.符合米兰标准的多发性肝细胞癌患者腹腔镜肝切除的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1144-1151. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0362. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
Liver Resection for Solitary Transplantable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of AFP-Score.孤立性可移植肝细胞癌的肝切除术:甲胎蛋白评分的作用
World J Surg. 2019 Jan;43(1):221-229. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4769-5.
10
Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh B Cirrhosis: Hepatic Resection Versus Living Donor Liver Transplantation.Child-Pugh B级肝硬化患者肝细胞癌的手术治疗:肝切除术与活体肝移植的比较
World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2606-2616. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4493-1.