• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用外科口罩时的言语理解:医疗保健中的一个问题?

Speech understanding using surgical masks: a problem in health care?

作者信息

Mendel Lisa Lucks, Gardino Julie A, Atcherson Samuel R

机构信息

School of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Memphis, 807 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Oct;19(9):686-95. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.9.4.

DOI:10.3766/jaaa.19.9.4
PMID:19418708
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful communication is necessary in health-care environments. Yet the presence of noise in hospitals, operating rooms, and dental offices may have a deleterious effect on health-care personnel and patients understanding messages accurately. The presence of a surgical mask and hearing loss may further affect speech perception.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a surgical mask had an effect on speech understanding for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment when speech stimuli were administered in the presence or absence of dental office noise.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Participants were assigned to one of two groups based on hearing sensitivity in this quasi-experimental, cross-sectional study.

STUDY SAMPLE

A total of 31 adults participated in this study (1 talker, 15 listeners with normal hearing, and 15 with hearing impairment). The normal hearing group had thresholds of 25 dB HL or better at the octave frequencies from 250 through 8000 Hz while the hearing loss group had varying degrees and configurations of hearing loss with thresholds equal to or poorer than 25 dB HL for the same octave frequencies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Selected lists from the Connected Speech Test (CST) were digitally recorded with and without a surgical mask present and then presented to the listeners in four conditions: without a mask in quiet, without a mask in noise, with a mask in quiet, and with a mask in noise.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found in the spectral analyses of the speech stimuli with and without the mask. The presence of a surgical mask, however, did not have a detrimental effect on speech understanding in either the normal-hearing or hearing-impaired groups. The dental office noise did have a significant effect on speech understanding for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the presence of a surgical mask did not negatively affect speech understanding. However, the presence of noise did have a deleterious effect on speech perception and warrants further attention in health-care environments.

摘要

背景

在医疗环境中,成功的沟通至关重要。然而,医院、手术室和牙科诊所中的噪音可能会对医护人员和患者准确理解信息产生有害影响。佩戴外科口罩和听力损失可能会进一步影响言语感知。

目的

评估在有或没有牙科诊所噪音的情况下给予言语刺激时,外科口罩对听力正常和听力受损的听众的言语理解是否有影响。

研究设计

在这项准实验性横断面研究中,根据听力敏感度将参与者分为两组之一。

研究样本

共有31名成年人参与了这项研究(1名说话者、15名听力正常的听众和15名听力受损者)。听力正常组在250至8000赫兹的倍频程频率下阈值为25分贝听力级或更好,而听力损失组有不同程度和类型的听力损失,在相同倍频程频率下阈值等于或差于25分贝听力级。

数据收集与分析

从连贯言语测试(CST)中选择的列表在有和没有外科口罩的情况下进行数字录制,然后在四种条件下呈现给听众:安静无口罩、噪音无口罩、安静有口罩、噪音有口罩。

结果

在有和没有口罩的言语刺激的频谱分析中发现了显著差异。然而,佩戴外科口罩对听力正常组或听力受损组的言语理解均没有不利影响。牙科诊所的噪音确实对两组的言语理解有显著影响。

结论

这些发现表明,佩戴外科口罩不会对言语理解产生负面影响。然而,噪音的存在确实会对言语感知产生有害影响,在医疗环境中值得进一步关注。

相似文献

1
Speech understanding using surgical masks: a problem in health care?使用外科口罩时的言语理解:医疗保健中的一个问题?
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Oct;19(9):686-95. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.9.4.
2
The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss.传统口罩和透明手术口罩对有听力损失和无听力损失个体言语理解的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):58-67. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15151.
3
A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).在多说话者嘈杂环境中两项单词识别任务的比较:噪声中的语音识别测试(SPRINT)和噪声中的单词测试(WIN)。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;19(7):548-56. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.7.4.
4
Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.听力正常的年轻听众和有听力损失的老年听众在间歇性噪声中的单词识别表现。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):90-109. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.2.4.
5
Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.低频通道中的时间处理:中年听众的年龄和听力损失的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):393-404. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.2.
6
A Transparent Mask and Clear Speech Benefit Speech Intelligibility in Individuals With Hearing Loss.透明口罩和清晰语音有助于听力损失者提高言语可懂度。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Nov 9;66(11):4558-4574. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00636. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
7
Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.语音识别对时间和频谱失真材料的影响:年龄和听力损失的作用。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.
8
Listening Effort and Speech Perception Performance Using Different Facemasks.使用不同口罩时的听力努力与言语感知表现
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Nov 17;65(11):4354-4368. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00081. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.高频纯音听力损失、噪声环境下听力测试(HINT)阈值与清晰度指数之间的关系。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(10):779-88. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.4.
10
Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.双耳预处理策略比较III:正常听力和听力受损听众的言语可懂度
Trends Hear. 2015 Dec 30;19:2331216515618609. doi: 10.1177/2331216515618609.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Prototype Transparent Mask, Opaque Mask, and No Mask on Speech Understanding in Noise.原型透明面罩、不透明面罩和无面罩对噪声环境下言语理解的比较。
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 11;15(4):103. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040103.
2
Effects of face protector devices on acoustic parameters of voice.面部防护装置对嗓音声学参数的影响。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024 Dec;44(6):377-391. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2851.
3
The impact of face coverings on audio-visual contributions to communication with conversational speech.面部遮盖物对通过对话语音进行交流的视听效果的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Apr 23;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00552-y.
4
Speech intelligibility in respiratory protective equipment - Implications for verbal communication in critical care.呼吸防护设备中的言语可懂度——对重症监护中言语交流的影响
Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2021 Feb;36:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Best practices for communication while wearing facemasks: A scoping review.戴口罩时的沟通最佳实践:范围综述。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2024 Mar;56(2):227-238. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12939. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
Mask wearing during neuropsychological assessment negatively impacts performance on verbal tests in older patients.戴口罩会使老年患者在神经心理学评估中的言语测试表现受到负面影响。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Nov;35(11):938-948. doi: 10.1037/pas0001261.
7
Acoustic and perceptual impact of face masks on speech: A scoping review.口罩对面部语音的声学和感知影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 25;18(8):e0285009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285009. eCollection 2023.
8
Hidden faces, altered perceptions: the impact of face masks on interpersonal perception.隐藏的面孔,改变的认知:口罩对人际认知的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 21;14:1203442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1203442. eCollection 2023.
9
Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories.口罩对面部语音范畴再标定的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2700-2717. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02715-3. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
The effects of face mask on speech production and its implication for forensic speaker identification-A cross-linguistic study.口罩对面部语音产生的影响及其对口音鉴定的启示——一项跨语言研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283724. eCollection 2023.