Fettes P D W, Jansson J-R, Wildsmith J A W
University Department of Anaesthesia, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):739-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep096. Epub 2009 May 6.
Although spinal (subarachnoid or intrathecal) anaesthesia is generally regarded as one of the most reliable types of regional block methods, the possibility of failure has long been recognized. Dealing with a spinal anaesthetic which is in some way inadequate can be very difficult; so, the technique must be performed in a way which minimizes the risk of regional block. Thus, practitioners must be aware of all the possible mechanisms of failure so that, where possible, these mechanisms can be avoided. This review has considered the mechanisms in a sequential way: problems with lumbar puncture; errors in the preparation and injection of solutions; inadequate spreading of drugs through cerebrospinal fluid; failure of drug action on nervous tissue; and difficulties more related to patient management than the actual block. Techniques for minimizing the possibility of failure are discussed, all of them requiring, in essence, close attention to detail. Options for managing an inadequate block include repeating the injection, manipulation of the patient's posture to encourage wider spread of the injected solution, supplementation with local anaesthetic infiltration by the surgeon, use of systemic sedation or analgesic drugs, and recourse to general anaesthesia. Follow-up procedures must include full documentation of what happened, the provision of an explanation to the patient and, if indicated by events, detailed investigation.
尽管脊髓(蛛网膜下腔或鞘内)麻醉通常被认为是最可靠的区域阻滞方法之一,但失败的可能性早已为人所知。处理某种程度上效果不佳的脊髓麻醉可能非常困难;因此,该技术的实施方式必须将区域阻滞风险降至最低。所以,从业者必须了解所有可能的失败机制,以便在可能的情况下避免这些机制。本综述按顺序探讨了这些机制:腰椎穿刺问题;溶液配制和注射中的错误;药物在脑脊液中扩散不充分;药物对神经组织作用失效;以及更多与患者管理而非实际阻滞相关的困难。文中讨论了将失败可能性降至最低的技术,实际上所有这些技术都需要密切关注细节。处理效果不佳的阻滞的选择包括重复注射、调整患者体位以促使注射溶液更广泛地扩散、由外科医生补充局部麻醉浸润、使用全身镇静或镇痛药物以及采用全身麻醉。后续程序必须包括对所发生情况的完整记录、向患者提供解释,并根据事件情况进行详细调查。