Müller E, Mittag O, Gülich M, Uhlmann A, Jäckel W H
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Abteilung Qualitätsmanagement und Sozialmedizin.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2009 Apr;48(2):62-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202295. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
Evidence-based medicine is a central issue in medical practice. This also applies to rehabilitation services. The German Statutory Pension Insurance meets this need in its guideline programme. Amongst others a guideline for rehabilitation following hip or knee arthroplasty is currently being developed. In this context a hierarchic, systematic literature analysis was conducted summarising the current state of evidence with reference to the effects and the treatment requirements (frequency and duration) of different rehabilitative therapies following total hip or knee replacement. In the first step, a search for evidence-based guidelines, systematic reviews and health technology assessments was conducted. Secondly, search strategies for primary literature in the following databases were designed: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO (01/1997-09/2007). Additionally, a handsearch of several German journals not listed in the databases was conducted. Randomized trials were preferred, however, non-randomized trials were included if the intervention and control groups were comparable with regard to the baseline parameters. Results can be classified into three categories: (1) therapies for which evidence for (positive) effects was found, (2) therapies for which evidence was found, however, their transferability onto rehabilitation in Germany should be discussed (e. g., studies on immediate post-surgery interventions), and (3) therapies for which no methodologically appropriate trials could be found. The literature reviewed does not allow for final conclusions as to frequency and duration of different therapeutic interventions within the rehabilitation time frame in Germany (usually the first three weeks post discharge from hospital). Overall, there is a need for further research.
循证医学是医学实践中的核心问题。这同样适用于康复服务。德国法定养老保险在其指南项目中满足了这一需求。其中,目前正在制定一项关于髋关节或膝关节置换术后康复的指南。在此背景下,进行了一次分层的、系统的文献分析,总结了全髋关节或膝关节置换术后不同康复治疗的效果及治疗要求(频率和时长)方面的现有证据状况。第一步,检索了循证指南、系统评价和卫生技术评估。第二步,设计了在以下数据库中检索原始文献的策略:考克兰对照试验中心注册库、医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库和心理学文摘数据库(1997年1月至2007年9月)。此外,还对数据库中未列出的几本德语期刊进行了手工检索。优先选择随机试验,然而,如果干预组和对照组在基线参数方面具有可比性,则纳入非随机试验。结果可分为三类:(1)发现有(积极)效果证据的治疗方法;(2)发现有证据,但应讨论其在德国康复中的适用性的治疗方法(例如,关于术后即刻干预的研究);(3)未找到方法学上合适试验的治疗方法。所审查的文献无法就德国康复时间框架内(通常为出院后的前三周)不同治疗干预的频率和时长得出最终结论。总体而言,仍需要进一步研究。