Suppr超能文献

通过德尔菲法制定用于衡量补充和替代医学普及率的共同核心标准。

Delphi-derived development of a common core for measuring complementary and alternative medicine prevalence.

作者信息

Lachance Laurie L, Hawthorne Victor, Brien Sarah, Hyland Michael E, Lewith George T, Verhoef Marja J, Warber Sara, Zick Suzanna

机构信息

Center for Managing Chronic Disease, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2029, USA.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2009 May;15(5):489-94. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0430.

Abstract

Assessing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use remains difficult due to many problems, not the least of which is defining therapies and modalities that should be considered as CAM. Members of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR) participated in a Delphi process to identify a core listing of common CAM therapies presently in use in Western countries. Lists of practitioner-based and self-administered CAM were constructed based on previous population-based surveys and ranked by ISCMR researchers by perceived level of importance. A total of 64 (49%) ISCMR members responded to the first round of the Delphi process, and 39 of these (61%) responded during the second round. There was agreement across all geographic regions (United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Western Europe) for the inclusion of herbal medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), chiropractic, naturopathy, osteopathy, Ayurvedic medicine, and massage therapy in the core practitioner-based CAM list, and for homeopathy products, herbal supplements, TCM products, naturopathic products, and nutritional products in the self-administered list. This Delphi process, along with the existing literature, has demonstrated that (1) separate lists are required to measure practitioner-based and self-administered CAM; (2) timeframes should include both ever use and recent use; (3) researchers should measure and report prevalence estimates for each individual therapy so that direct comparisons can be made across studies, time, and populations; (4) the list of CAM therapies should include a core list and additionally those therapies appropriate to the geographic region, population, and the specific research questions addressed, and (5) intended populations and samples studied should be defined by the researcher so that the generalizability of findings can be assessed. Ultimately, it is important to find out what CAM modality people are using and if they are being helped by these interventions.

摘要

由于存在诸多问题,评估补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用情况仍然困难重重,其中最主要的问题之一是界定应被视为补充和替代医学的疗法和方式。国际补充医学研究协会(ISCMR)的成员参与了一项德尔菲法流程,以确定目前在西方国家使用的常见补充和替代医学疗法的核心清单。基于先前的人群调查构建了基于从业者的补充和替代医学清单以及自我管理的补充和替代医学清单,并由ISCMR的研究人员根据感知的重要程度进行排序。共有64名(49%)ISCMR成员回复了第一轮德尔菲法流程,其中39名(61%)在第二轮回复。所有地理区域(美国、英国、加拿大和西欧)都一致同意在基于从业者的补充和替代医学核心清单中纳入草药医学、针灸、顺势疗法、中医、脊椎按摩疗法、自然疗法、整骨疗法、阿育吠陀医学和按摩疗法,以及在自我管理清单中纳入顺势疗法产品、草药补充剂、中医产品、自然疗法产品和营养产品。这一德尔菲法流程以及现有文献表明:(1)需要分别列出基于从业者的和自我管理的补充和替代医学的清单;(2)时间框架应同时包括曾经使用和最近使用的情况;(3)研究人员应测量并报告每种疗法的患病率估计值,以便能够在不同研究、时间和人群之间进行直接比较;(4)补充和替代医学疗法清单应包括一个核心清单,此外还应包括适合地理区域、人群以及所涉及的具体研究问题的疗法;(5)研究人员应界定目标人群和所研究的样本,以便能够评估研究结果的可推广性。最终,弄清楚人们使用的是哪种补充和替代医学模式以及他们是否从这些干预措施中受益非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验