Jeitler Michael, Ortiz Miriam, Brinkhaus Benno, Sigl Mike, Hoffmann Rasmus, Trübner Miriam, Michalsen Andreas, Wischnewsky Manfred, Kessler Christian S
Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine and Nature-Based Therapies, Immanuel Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 13;11:1372924. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1372924. eCollection 2024.
Older representative surveys show that Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) is used by about 60% of the German population. However, no data exists for the current nationwide situation. The main aim of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the current use and acceptance of TCIM in Germany.
This study is based on a representative sample of the German population aged 18-75 years. Participants were asked about the use and acceptance of TCIM. The survey was conducted online using Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) in 2022 by three renowned German market research institutes on behalf of and in close coordination with the working group. The data set was analyzed descriptively and inferentially.
In total, 4,065 participants (52% female, 48% male, 0.4% diverse) responded completely (response rate: 21.5%). Among participants, 70% stated that they had used TCIM at some point in their lives, with 32% doing so in the last 12 months and 18% currently. The most common reason given (17%) was musculoskeletal pain. For their own health, 39% stated that TCIM is important. Traditional European Medicine was rated as very/mainly effective by 27% of participants and as partly effective by 44% (conventional medicine: 69% very/mainly effective, 19% partly effective). As a complementary treatment strategy to conventional medicine, 35% considered TCIM to be optimal ("Complementary Medicine"), 33% in combination with conventional medicine ("Integrative Medicine") and 5% without conventional medicine ("Alternative Medicine"). The majority of the participants were in favor of more research on TCIM and stated that the costs of TCIM services should be covered by health insurance companies (71% and 69%, respectively).
These results from a representative online-population suggest that the use of TCIM in Germany remains at a high level. The nationwide relevance of TCIM should be given greater consideration in German health care policy making. TCIM should be systematically investigated using appropriate study designs and methods including high quality randomized clinical trials to investigate their effectiveness, efficacy, therapeutic safety and costs in the future.
以往具有代表性的调查显示,约60%的德国人口使用传统、补充和整合医学(TCIM)。然而,目前尚无关于全国现状的数据。这项横断面研究的主要目的是调查德国目前对TCIM的使用情况和接受程度。
本研究基于德国18至75岁人口的代表性样本。参与者被问及对TCIM的使用情况和接受程度。该调查于2022年由三家著名的德国市场研究机构通过计算机辅助网络访谈(CAWI)在线进行,代表并与工作组密切协调。对数据集进行了描述性和推断性分析。
共有4065名参与者(52%为女性,48%为男性,0.4%为其他)完整作答(回复率:21.5%)。在参与者中,70%表示他们在生活中的某个时候使用过TCIM,其中32%在过去12个月内使用过,18%目前正在使用。给出的最常见原因(17%)是肌肉骨骼疼痛。对于自身健康,39%的人表示TCIM很重要。27%的参与者认为传统欧洲医学非常/主要有效,44%认为部分有效(传统医学:69%非常/主要有效,19%部分有效)。作为传统医学的补充治疗策略,35%的人认为TCIM是最佳选择(“补充医学”),33%的人认为与传统医学结合使用(“整合医学”),5%的人认为不使用传统医学(“替代医学”)。大多数参与者赞成对TCIM进行更多研究,并表示TCIM服务的费用应由健康保险公司承担(分别为71%和69%)。
这些来自代表性在线人群的结果表明,德国对TCIM的使用水平仍然很高。在德国医疗保健政策制定中,应更多地考虑TCIM在全国范围内的相关性。未来应使用适当的研究设计和方法,包括高质量的随机临床试验,对TCIM进行系统研究,以调查其有效性、疗效、治疗安全性和成本。