Meuleman E J, Wijkstra H, Doesburg W H, Debruyne F M
Department of Urology and Statistical Consultation, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Urol. 1991 Nov;146(5):1266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38065-5.
We performed cavernosometry in 96 patients with erectile dysfunction. Two different techniques were compared: pump cavernosometry using a roller pump as the inflow source and gravity cavernosometry using an infusion set as the inflow source. We conclude that the diagnostic value of both techniques is comparable. In pump cavernosometry maintenance flow is the most accurate parameter of veno-occlusive function. Gravity cavernosometry has the advantages of simplicity, cost-effectiveness and a lower complication rate. Incomplete cavernous smooth muscle relaxation appeared to be limiting the diagnostic value of both techniques.
我们对96例勃起功能障碍患者进行了海绵体测压。比较了两种不同的技术：使用滚轴泵作为流入源的泵式海绵体测压和使用输液装置作为流入源的重力式海绵体测压。我们得出结论，两种技术的诊断价值相当。在泵式海绵体测压中，维持流量是静脉闭塞功能最准确的参数。重力式海绵体测压具有操作简单、成本效益高和并发症发生率低的优点。海绵体平滑肌不完全松弛似乎限制了两种技术的诊断价值。
