Olesen Solveig Gaarn, Hammerum Steen
De partment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester). 2009;15(2):239-48. doi: 10.1255/ejms.970.
It is generally expected that the hydrogen bond strength in a D-H(***)A adduct is predicted by the difference between the proton affinities (DeltaPA) of D and A, measured by the adduct stabilization and demonstrated by the infrared (IR) redshift of the D-H bond stretching vibrational frequency. These criteria do not always yield consistent predictions, as illustrated by the hydrogen bonds formed by the E and Z OH groups of protonated carboxylic acids. The DeltaPA and the stabilization of a series of hydrogen bonded adducts indicate that the E OH group forms the stronger hydrogen bonds, whereas the bond length changes and the redshift favor the Z OH group, matching the results of NBO and AIM calculations. This reflects that the thermochemistry of adduct formation is not a good measure of the hydrogen bond strength in charged adducts, and that the ionic interactions in the E and Z adducts of protonated carboxylic acids are different. The OH bond length and IR redshift afford the better measure of hydrogen bond strength.
一般认为,D-H(***)A加合物中的氢键强度可通过D和A的质子亲和能之差(ΔPA)来预测,该差值通过加合物稳定性来测量,并通过D-H键伸缩振动频率的红外(IR)红移来证明。这些标准并不总是能得出一致的预测结果,质子化羧酸的E型和Z型OH基团形成的氢键就说明了这一点。一系列氢键加合物的ΔPA和稳定性表明,E型OH基团形成的氢键更强,而键长变化和红移则有利于Z型OH基团,这与NBO和AIM计算结果相符。这反映出加合物形成的热化学并不是衡量带电加合物中氢键强度的好方法,且质子化羧酸的E型和Z型加合物中的离子相互作用是不同的。OH键长和IR红移能更好地衡量氢键强度。