• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Validation of two short versions of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in Colombian adolescents].[哥伦比亚青少年中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表两个简短版本的验证]
Aten Primaria. 2009 May;41(5):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 May 8.
2
[Validity and reliability of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale in Colombian adolescent students].[哥伦比亚青少年学生中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的效度与信度]
Biomedica. 2009 Jun;29(2):260-9.
3
[Validation of the short version of the Leyton obsessional inventory for children and adolescents in Bucaramanga, Colombia].[哥伦比亚布卡拉曼加市儿童及青少年版莱顿强迫观念量表简版的验证]
Aten Primaria. 2007 Feb;39(2):75-80. doi: 10.1157/13098674.
4
Psychometric properties and validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a population attending an HIV clinic in Cali, Colombia.哥伦比亚卡利市一家艾滋病诊所就诊人群中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的心理测量特性及效度
Biomedica. 2019 Mar 31;39(1):33-45. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v39i1.3843.
5
The Psychometric Properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Chinese Primary Care Patients: Factor Structure, Construct Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity and Responsiveness.中国基层医疗患者中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的心理测量学特性:因子结构、结构效度、信度、敏感性和反应性。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0135131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135131. eCollection 2015.
6
Reliability, validity and factor structure of the CES-D in Iranian elderly.伊朗老年人中流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的信度、效度及因子结构
Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Dec;18:86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Validation of the 10-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10) in Zulu, Xhosa and Afrikaans populations in South Africa.10项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D-10)在南非祖鲁族、科萨族和南非荷兰语人群中的效度验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1178-x.
8
[Factorial structure and psychometric properties of a scale for depression among university students in Colombia].[哥伦比亚大学生抑郁量表的因子结构和心理测量特性]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2010 Feb;27(2):110-6.
9
Screening value of the Center for epidemiologic studies - depression scale among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a validation study.越南胡志明市艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的筛查价值:一项验证研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 13;16:145. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0860-3.
10
Validity and Utility of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Detecting Depression in Family Caregivers of Persons with Dementia.用于检测痴呆患者家庭成员中抑郁症状的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的有效性和实用性。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):323-334. doi: 10.1159/000500940. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Can the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Be Used to Screen for Depression in Children and Adolescents? An Updated Systematic Review.流行病学研究中心抑郁量表能否用于筛查儿童和青少年的抑郁症?一项更新的系统评价。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Apr;56(2):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01553-6. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
2
Validation of the Spanish Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scales: a comparative validation study.西班牙流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和宗氏自评抑郁量表的验证:一项比较验证研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045413. Epub 2012 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults.《使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表评估青少年和青年群体的抑郁症状》。
J Youth Adolesc. 1991 Apr;20(2):149-66. doi: 10.1007/BF01537606.
2
[Validity and reliability of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale in Colombian adolescent students].[哥伦比亚青少年学生中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的效度与信度]
Biomedica. 2009 Jun;29(2):260-9.
3
[Prevalence of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and its comorbidity with Major Depressive Disorder in adolescent students].[青少年学生中强迫症及其与重度抑郁症共病的患病率]
Vertex. 2008 Mar-Apr;19(78):5-9.
4
Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis.探索性因素分析:其在项目分析中的作用。
J Pers Assess. 1997 Jun;68(3):532-60. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5.
5
Validity of a 12-item version of the CES-D used in the National Longitudinal Study of Children and Youth.用于全国儿童和青少年纵向研究的12项版流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的效度。
Chronic Dis Can. 2005 Spring-Summer;26(2-3):65-72.
6
The prevalence of suicidal phenomena in adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies.青少年自杀现象的患病率:基于人群研究的系统综述
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2005 Jun;35(3):239-50. doi: 10.1521/suli.2005.35.3.239.
7
Temporal associations between depressive symptoms and self-reported sexually transmitted disease among adolescents.青少年抑郁症状与自我报告的性传播疾病之间的时间关联。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jun;156(6):599-606. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.6.599.
8
Changes in the rate of diagnosis of major depression in adolescents following routine use of a depression rating scale.在常规使用抑郁评定量表后青少年重度抑郁症诊断率的变化。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;36(2):229-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00995.x.
9
Mental health, educational, and social role outcomes of adolescents with depression.抑郁症青少年的心理健康、教育及社会角色结局
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;59(3):225-31. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.3.225.
10
The evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: Depressed and Positive Affect in cancer patients and healthy reference subjects.流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)评估:癌症患者与健康对照受试者的抑郁及积极情绪
Qual Life Res. 2000;9(9):1015-29. doi: 10.1023/a:1016673003237.

[哥伦比亚青少年中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表两个简短版本的验证]

[Validation of two short versions of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in Colombian adolescents].

作者信息

Rueda-Jaimes German Eduardo, Camacho López Paul Anthony, Rangel-Martínez-Villalba Andrés Mauricio

机构信息

Grupo de Neuropsiquiatría, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2009 May;41(5):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2008.09.005
PMID:19427072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7021936/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the validity and reliability of a Brief and Ultra-short Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale in adolescents.

DESIGN

Validation study.

SETTING

Secondary schools in Bucaramanga, Colombia.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 474 students were selected through a three stage process; 68 did not agree to participate, 8 were excluded and 8 did not complete the process.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Adolescent students were evaluated with CES-D and the clinical interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. The CES-D scale was re-applied 3 to 28 days after the first application. The ten items and the three items with the highest correlation with total score were selected to construct a Brief scale and Ultra-short scale, respectively. Construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency were analyzed.

RESULTS

For the Brief CES-D Scale the Cronbach's alpha was 0.86 and Lin's coefficient was 0.77. The area under ROC curve was 0.83, with a sensitivity of 77.8%; specificity 74.1%. Two main factors were identified to explain the 55.81% variance. For the Ultra-short Scale the Cronbach's alpha was 0.76 and Lin's coefficient was 0.74. The area under ROC curve was 0.80, with a sensitivity of 75.56%; specificity 70.67%. One main factor was identified to explain the 68.19% of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The Brief and Ultra-Short CES-D Scale are as useful as the original scale for the screening of MDD in adolescents; Ultra-short CES-D Scale does not preserve the original factorial structure.

摘要

目的

建立青少年简明及超短版流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的有效性和可靠性。

设计

效度研究。

地点

哥伦比亚布卡拉曼加的中学。

参与者

通过三阶段流程共选取了474名学生;68人不同意参与,8人被排除,8人未完成该流程。

主要测量指标

采用CES-D对青少年学生进行评估,并依据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版进行临床访谈。在首次应用CES-D量表3至28天后再次应用该量表。分别选取与总分相关性最高的10个条目和3个条目构建简明版量表和超短版量表。分析结构效度、效标效度、重测信度和内部一致性。

结果

简明CES-D量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.86,林氏系数为0.77。ROC曲线下面积为0.83,灵敏度为77.8%;特异度为74.1%。确定了两个主要因素来解释55.81%的方差。超短版量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.76,林氏系数为0.74。ROC曲线下面积为0.80,灵敏度为75.56%;特异度为70.67%。确定了一个主要因素来解释68.19%的方差。

结论

简明及超短版CES-D量表在青少年抑郁症筛查中与原版量表同样有用;超短版CES-D量表未保留原有的因子结构。