Hiraki Takao, Mimura Hidefumi, Gobara Hideo, Iguchi Toshihiro, Fujiwara Hiroyasu, Sakurai Jun, Matsui Yusuke, Inoue Daisaku, Toyooka Shinichi, Sano Yoshifumi, Kanazawa Susumu
Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Chest. 2009 Dec;136(6):1612-1617. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0370. Epub 2009 May 8.
Although conventional CT scan-guided needle biopsy is an established diagnostic method for pulmonary lesions, few large studies have been conducted on the diagnostic outcomes of CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy. We have conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the diagnostic outcomes of 1,000 CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsies performed with 20-gauge coaxial cutting needles.
We determined the diagnostic yield of CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsies performed with 20-gauge coaxial cutting needles for 1,000 lesions in 901 patients. Independent risk factors for diagnostic failure (ie, nondiagnostic, false-positive, and false-negative results) were determined with multivariate logistic regression analysis.
The biopsy results were nondiagnostic in 0.6% of the lesions (6 of 1,000 lesions). The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy was 94.2% (741 of 787 lesions) and 99.1% (211 of 213 lesions), respectively; diagnostic accuracy was 95.2% (952 of 1,000 lesions). For lesions measuring <or= 1.0 cm, the diagnostic accuracy was 92.7% (140 of 151 lesions). The significant independent risk factors for diagnostic failure were as follows: the acquisition of two or fewer specimens (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; p = 0.007), lesions in the lower lobe (OR, 2.50; p = 0.003), malignant lesions (OR, 7.16; p = 0.007), and lesions measuring <or= 1.0 cm (OR, 3.85; p = 0.016) and >or= 3.1 cm (OR, 4.32; p = 0.007).
CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy performed with 20-gauge coaxial cutting needles resulted in a high diagnostic yield, even in the case of small lesions. Factors such as the acquisition of two or fewer specimens, lesions in the lower lobe, malignant lesions, and lesions measuring <or= 1.0 cm or >or= 3.1 cm significantly increased the rate of diagnostic failure.
尽管传统的CT扫描引导下经皮肺穿刺活检是肺部病变的一种成熟诊断方法,但关于CT透视引导下肺活检诊断结果的大型研究较少。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估使用20G同轴切割针进行的1000例CT透视引导下肺活检的诊断结果。
我们确定了使用20G同轴切割针在901例患者的1000个病变中进行CT透视引导下肺活检的诊断率。通过多因素逻辑回归分析确定诊断失败(即未诊断、假阳性和假阴性结果)的独立危险因素。
0.6%的病变(1000个病变中的6个)活检结果未明确诊断。诊断恶性肿瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为94.2%(787个病变中的741个)和99.1%(213个病变中的211个);诊断准确率为95.2%(1000个病变中的952个)。对于直径≤1.0 cm的病变,诊断准确率为92.7%(151个病变中的140个)。诊断失败的显著独立危险因素如下:获取标本数量为两个或更少(比值比[OR],2.43;P = 0.007)、下叶病变(OR,2.50;P = 0.003)、恶性病变(OR,7.16;P = 0.007)以及直径≤1.0 cm(OR,3.85;P = 0.016)和≥3.1 cm(OR,4.32;P = 0.007)的病变。
使用20G同轴切割针进行CT透视引导下肺活检即使对于小病变也能获得较高的诊断率。获取标本数量为两个或更少、下叶病变、恶性病变以及直径≤1.0 cm或≥3.1 cm等因素显著增加了诊断失败率。