Zhang Lu, Shi Lei, Xiao Zhiping, Qiu Hong, Peng Ping, Zhang Mingsheng
The Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0192920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192920. eCollection 2018.
Coaxial technique is extensively applied to facilitate percutaneous lung lesion biopsy. However, the impact of coaxial technique on diagnostic accuracy remains undecided. We reviewed 485 patients who underwent percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsies of lung lesions in our hospital. All of these biopsies were performed using either a cutting needle alone (n = 268) or a cutting needle combined with a coaxial needle (n = 217). The diagnostic accuracy and complications resulting from the two techniques were then compared. The diagnostic accuracies of the two techniques were comparably high, at 98.2% (with coaxial technique) and 95.9% (without coaxial technique), p = 0.24. Subgroup analysis discovered that for patients with lesions measuring < 1.5 cm and needle path length ≥ 4 cm, the coaxial technique achieved a higher diagnostic accuracy (95.5% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.023). The biopsy was well tolerated in all of the patients. Pneumothorax occurred less often in patients who were biopsied with the coaxial technique (19 versus 43, p = 0.024). Thus, the application of the coaxial technique could improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with small and deep lung lesions, and could reduce the risk of pneumothorax. The combined use of cutting needles with coaxial needles is the preferred technique for performing percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsies.
同轴技术被广泛应用于促进经皮肺病变活检。然而,同轴技术对诊断准确性的影响仍未确定。我们回顾了我院485例接受经皮CT引导下肺病变穿刺活检的患者。所有这些活检均单独使用切割针(n = 268)或切割针与同轴针联合使用(n = 217)进行。然后比较了这两种技术的诊断准确性和并发症。两种技术的诊断准确性相当高,同轴技术组为98.2%,非同轴技术组为95.9%,p = 0.24。亚组分析发现,对于病变小于1.5 cm且针道长度≥4 cm的患者,同轴技术的诊断准确性更高(95.5%对72.7%,p = 0.023)。所有患者对活检耐受性良好。采用同轴技术进行活检的患者气胸发生率较低(19例对43例,p = 0.024)。因此,同轴技术的应用可提高小而深的肺病变患者的诊断准确性,并可降低气胸风险。切割针与同轴针联合使用是经皮CT引导下肺活检的首选技术。