Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Qual Health Res. 2009 Jun;19(6):850-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732309335857.
Here we examine articles that were published between 1999 and 2007 in Qualitative Health Research (QHR), and between 2000 and 2006 in Qualitative Research (QR), and sort them according to (a) the number of qualitative research publications by year, (b) data analysis by methodology, (c) data analysis by author, (d) the use of computer programs for data analysis, and (e) analysis process and procedure. To promote a further understanding of the procedures used in qualitative research, we then discuss similarities and differences between the categories. We suggest that a certain detachment from the "rules" will help qualitative researchers maintain reflective insight into data so they can successfully conceptualize the work involved.
在此，我们审视了1999年至2007年间发表在《质性健康研究》（QHR）上的文章，以及2000年至2006年间发表在《质性研究》（QR）上的文章，并按照以下方式进行分类：（a）按年份统计的质性研究出版物数量；（b）按方法进行的数据分析；（c）按作者进行的数据分析；（d）用于数据分析的计算机程序的使用情况；（e）分析过程和步骤。为了促进对质性研究中所使用程序的进一步理解，我们随后讨论了各分类之间的异同。我们认为，在一定程度上脱离“规则”将有助于质性研究者保持对数据的反思性洞察，从而能够成功地对所涉及的工作进行概念化。
