Maikala Rammohan V, Dempsey Patrick G, Ciriello Vincent M, O'Brien Niall V
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.
Ergonomics. 2009 Jun;52(6):735-46. doi: 10.1080/00140130802524625.
Pushing is an important materials handling activity in many occupations; however, pushing-related physiological investigations are still in infancy. The purpose was to evaluate maximum acceptable forces and physiological responses while pushing on: treadmill (TREAD); plywood floor (PLY); and Teflon floor (TEF). Acceptable forces, cardiopulmonary and calf muscle oxygenation and blood volume responses were collected simultaneously while 12 men (age 39 +/- 13 years; height 178 +/- 6 cm; and body mass 91.5 +/- 16 kg) pushed for 2 h on each surface at their psychophysical workload. Participants selected higher forces on the PLY, resulting in higher pulmonary oxygen uptake compared to that of TEF (by approximately 9%) and TREAD (by approximately 18%). Pushing on the TEF demonstrated 50-56% lower blood volume changes and 1.5-1.8 times more oxygenation-force ratio than that for other surfaces. It is concluded that, to avoid a potential slip, participants were conservative in selecting acceptable forces to push on the slippery TEF. Part of this compensatory strategy on the TEF resulted in less muscle activity and, therefore, less demand for oxygen delivery to the calf muscle than for other surfaces. The present findings of significant force- and physiological-related differences in treadmill vs. high inertia pushcart clearly demonstrate that pushing experiments are essential to evaluate functional abilities of the workers.
在许多职业中,推是一项重要的物料搬运活动;然而,与推相关的生理学研究仍处于起步阶段。目的是评估在跑步机(TREAD)、胶合板地面(PLY)和特氟龙地面(TEF)上推时的最大可接受力和生理反应。在12名男性(年龄39±13岁;身高178±6厘米;体重91.5±16千克)以其心理物理学工作量在每个表面上推2小时的同时,同步收集可接受力、心肺和小腿肌肉氧合及血容量反应。参与者在PLY上选择了更大的力,导致与TEF相比肺摄氧量更高(约高9%),与TREAD相比更高(约高18%)。在TEF上推时,血容量变化降低了50 - 56%,氧合力比是其他表面的1.5 - 1.8倍。得出的结论是,为避免潜在滑倒,参与者在选择可接受力在光滑的TEF上推时较为保守。在TEF上的这种补偿策略部分导致肌肉活动减少,因此与其他表面相比,向小腿肌肉输送氧气的需求也更少。跑步机与高惯性推车在力和生理方面存在显著差异的当前研究结果清楚地表明,推实验对于评估工人的功能能力至关重要。