Suppr超能文献

女工动态推拉力的心理生理测定:两种仪器的比较。

Psychophysically determined forces of dynamic pushing for female industrial workers: Comparison of two apparatuses.

机构信息

Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2010 Jan;41(1):141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

Abstract

Using psychophysics, the maximum acceptable forces for pushing have been previously developed using a magnetic particle brake (MPB) treadmill at the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety. The objective of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of maximum acceptable initial and sustained forces while performing a pushing task at a frequency of 1min(-1) both on a MPB treadmill and on a high-inertia pushcart. This is important because our pushing guidelines are used extensively as a ergonomic redesign strategy and we would like the information to be as applicable as possible to cart pushing. On two separate days, nineteen female industrial workers performed a 40-min MPB treadmill pushing task and a 2-hr pushcart task, in the context of a larger experiment. During pushing, the subjects were asked to select a workload they could sustain for 8h without "straining themselves or without becoming unusually tired, weakened, overheated or out of breath." The results demonstrated that maximum acceptable initial and sustained forces of pushing determined on the high inertia pushcart were 0.8% and 2.5% lower than the MPB treadmill. The results also show that the maximum acceptable sustained force of the MPB treadmill task was 0.5% higher than the maximum acceptable sustained force of Snook and Ciriello (1991). Overall, the findings confirm that the existing pushing data developed by the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety still provides an accurate estimate of maximal acceptable forces for the selected combination of distance and frequency of push for female industrial workers.

摘要

利用心理物理学,先前已使用 Liberty Mutual 研究安全研究所的磁粉制动器 (MPB) 跑步机开发了最大可接受的推挤力。本研究的目的是研究在 1 分钟频率下执行推挤任务时,初始最大可接受力和持续力的可重复性,同时在 MPB 跑步机和高惯性推车两种设备上进行。这一点很重要,因为我们的推挤指南被广泛用作人体工程学重新设计策略,我们希望这些信息尽可能适用于推车推挤。在两个不同的日子里,19 名女性工业工人在一个更大的实验中,分别完成了 40 分钟的 MPB 跑步机推挤任务和 2 小时的推车任务。在推挤过程中,要求受试者选择一个他们可以维持 8 小时的工作量,而不会“感到自己紧张或异常疲劳、虚弱、过热或喘不过气来”。结果表明,在高惯性推车上确定的最大可接受初始和持续推挤力比 MPB 跑步机分别低 0.8%和 2.5%。结果还表明,MPB 跑步机任务的最大可接受持续力比 Snook 和 Ciriello(1991)的最大可接受持续力高 0.5%。总体而言,这些发现证实了 Liberty Mutual 研究安全研究所开发的现有推挤数据仍然为女性工业工人选择的距离和频率组合提供了最大可接受力的准确估计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验