Forbes Valery E, Hommen Udo, Thorbek Pernille, Heimbach Fred, Van den Brink Paul J, Wogram Jörn, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Grimm Volker
Centre for Integrated Population Ecology, Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Jan;5(1):167-72. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2008-029.1.
This brief communication reports on the main findings of the LEMTOX workshop, held from 9 to 12 September 2007, at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Leipzig, Germany. The workshop brought together a diverse group of stakeholders from academia, regulatory authorities, contract research organizations, and industry, representing Europe, the United States, and Asia, to discuss the role of ecological modeling in risk assessments of pesticides, particularly under the European regulatory framework. The following questions were addressed: What are the potential benefits of using ecological models in pesticide registration and risk assessment? What obstacles prevent ecological modeling from being used routinely in regulatory submissions? What actions are needed to overcome the identified obstacles? What recommendations should be made to ensure good modeling practice in this context? The workshop focused exclusively on population models, and discussion was focused on those categories of population models that link effects on individuals (e.g., survival, growth, reproduction, behavior) to effects on population dynamics. The workshop participants concluded that the overall benefits of ecological modeling are that it could bring more ecology into ecological risk assessment, and it could provide an excellent tool for exploring the importance of, and interactions among, ecological complexities. However, there are a number of challenges that need to be overcome before such models will receive wide acceptance for pesticide risk assessment, despite having been used extensively in other contexts (e.g., conservation biology). The need for guidance on Good Modeling Practice (on model development, analysis, interpretation, evaluation, documentation, and communication), as well as the need for case studies that can be used to explore the added value of ecological models for risk assessment, were identified as top priorities. Assessing recovery potential of exposed nontarget species and clarifying the ecological relevance of standard laboratory test results are two areas for which ecological modeling may be able to provide considerable benefits.
本简短通讯报道了2007年9月9日至12日在德国莱比锡亥姆霍兹环境研究中心(UFZ)举办的LEMTOX研讨会的主要成果。该研讨会汇聚了来自学术界、监管机构、合同研究组织和行业的不同利益相关者,代表欧洲、美国和亚洲,共同讨论生态模型在农药风险评估中的作用,特别是在欧洲监管框架下。会议探讨了以下问题:在农药登记和风险评估中使用生态模型有哪些潜在益处?哪些障碍阻碍了生态模型在监管申报中的常规使用?需要采取哪些行动来克服已识别的障碍?在此背景下应提出哪些建议以确保良好的建模实践?研讨会专门聚焦于种群模型,讨论集中在将个体效应(如生存、生长、繁殖、行为)与种群动态效应联系起来的种群模型类别。研讨会参与者得出结论,生态建模的总体益处在于它能将更多生态学知识引入生态风险评估,并且能为探索生态复杂性的重要性及相互作用提供出色工具。然而,尽管此类模型在其他领域(如保护生物学)已被广泛使用,但在其被广泛接受用于农药风险评估之前,仍有一些挑战需要克服。确定了对良好建模实践(关于模型开发、分析、解释、评估、记录和交流)的指导需求,以及对可用于探索生态模型在风险评估中附加价值的案例研究的需求,这两者被列为首要优先事项。评估受暴露非靶标物种的恢复潜力以及阐明标准实验室测试结果的生态相关性是生态建模可能能够提供显著益处的两个领域。