Independent Researcher, 28009 Madrid, Spain.
PharmaMar, Colmenar Viejo, 28770 Madrid, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 21;18(15):7720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157720.
Environmental risk assessment is a key process for the authorization of pesticides, and is subjected to continuous challenges and updates. Current approaches are based on standard scenarios and independent substance-crop assessments. This arrangement does not address the complexity of agricultural ecosystems with mammals feeding on different crops. This work presents a simplified model for regulatory use addressing landscape variability, co-exposure to several pesticides, and predicting the effect on population abundance. The focus is on terrestrial vertebrates and the aim is the identification of the key risk drivers impacting on mid-term population dynamics. The model is parameterized for EU assessments according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Guidance Document, but can be adapted to other regulatory schemes. The conceptual approach includes two modules: (a) the species population dynamics, and (b) the population impact of pesticide exposure. Population dynamics is modelled through daily survival and seasonal reproductions rates; which are modified in case of pesticide exposure. All variables, parameters, and functions can be modified. The model has been calibrated with ecological data for wild rabbits and brown hares and tested for two herbicides, glyphosate and bromoxynil, using validated toxicity data extracted from EFSA assessments. Results demonstrate that the information available for a regulatory assessment, according to current EU information requirements, is sufficient for predicting the impact and possible consequences at population dynamic levels. The model confirms that agroecological parameters play a key role when assessing the effect of pesticide exposure on population abundance. The integration of laboratory toxicity studies with this simplified landscape model allows for the identification of conditions leading to population vulnerability or resilience. An Annex includes a detailed assessment of the model characteristics according to the EFSA scheme on Good Modelling Practice.
环境风险评估是农药批准的关键过程,不断面临挑战和更新。目前的方法基于标准情景和独立物质-作物评估。这种安排不能解决哺乳动物以不同作物为食的农业生态系统的复杂性。本工作提出了一种简化的监管模型,用于解决景观变异性、同时接触多种农药以及预测对种群丰度的影响。重点是陆地脊椎动物,目的是确定影响中期种群动态的关键风险驱动因素。该模型根据欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)指南文件针对欧盟评估进行了参数化,但可以适应其他监管方案。概念方法包括两个模块:(a)物种种群动态,和(b)农药暴露对种群的影响。种群动态通过每日存活率和季节性繁殖率来建模;如果接触农药,这些比率会发生变化。所有变量、参数和功能都可以修改。该模型已使用野生兔和棕兔的生态数据进行校准,并使用从 EFSA 评估中提取的经过验证的毒性数据对两种除草剂草甘膦和溴苯腈进行了测试。结果表明,根据当前欧盟信息要求,监管评估可用的信息足以预测在种群动态水平上的影响和可能的后果。该模型证实,在评估农药暴露对种群丰度的影响时,农业生态参数起着关键作用。将实验室毒性研究与这种简化的景观模型相结合,可以确定导致种群脆弱性或弹性的条件。附录包括根据 EFSA 良好建模实践方案对模型特征的详细评估。