Suppr超能文献

在佛罗里达州中北部郊区环境中,对六种用于收集白纹伊蚊及相关蚊种的诱蚊器进行评估。

Evaluation of six mosquito traps for collection of Aedes albopictus and associated mosquito species in a suburban setting in north central Florida.

作者信息

Hoel D F, Kline D L, Allan S A

机构信息

Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, USDA/ARS, 1600/1700 SW 23rd Dr., Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.

出版信息

J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Mar;25(1):47-57. doi: 10.2987/08-5800.1.

Abstract

We compared 6 adult mosquito traps for effectiveness in collecting Aedes albopictus from suburban backyards with the goal of finding a more suitable surveillance replacement for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap. Trap selection included 2 commercial propane traps (Mosquito Magnet Professional trap and Mosquito Magnet Liberty trap), 2 Aedes-specific traps (Fay-Prince Omnidirectional trap and Wilton trap), 1 experimental trap (Mosquito Magnet-X trap), and a standard surveillance CDC light trap that served as a control. Traps that did not generate carbon dioxide were provided with bottled CO2 at a flow rate of 500 ml/min. Those traps designed for use with chemical attractants (Mosquito Magnet traps) were baited with Lurex (L-lactic acid) and octenol (1-octen-3-ol) commercial baits, known attractants to Ae. albopictus. Three repetitions of a 6 x 6 Latin square test yielded a total of 37,237 mosquitoes, of which 5,280 (14.2%) were Ae. albopictus. Significantly more (P < 0.05) Ae. albopictus were collected from the experimental and commercial traps (4,244/5,280; 80.3%) than from the CDC light trap and Aedes-specific traps. The Mosquito Magnet Liberty collected the most Ae. albopictus (1,591), accounting for 30.1% of the total take, followed closely by the Mosquito Magnet-X (1,468) and the Mosquito Magnet Pro (1,185). The omnidirectional Fay-Prince trap performed better than the CDC or Wilton trap. Twenty-seven mosquito species were collected during these trials, 9 species in large enough numbers for meaningful analysis. Aedes albopictus was the second most common mosquito trapped. The results of these trials indicate that propane-powered commercial traps would serve as useful substitutes in lieu of CDC traps in Ae. albopictus surveillance efforts. Trap features advantageous for collecting Ae. albopictus and other mosquito species are discussed.

摘要

我们比较了6种成年蚊虫诱捕器在从郊区后院收集白纹伊蚊方面的有效性,目的是找到一种更适合替代疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)诱蚊灯的监测工具。诱捕器的选择包括2种商用丙烷诱捕器(灭蚊磁体专业版诱捕器和灭蚊磁体自由版诱捕器)、2种特定于伊蚊的诱捕器(费-普林斯顿全向诱捕器和威尔顿诱捕器)、1种实验性诱捕器(灭蚊磁体-X诱捕器),以及一个作为对照的标准监测用CDC诱蚊灯。不产生二氧化碳的诱捕器以500毫升/分钟的流速提供瓶装二氧化碳。那些设计用于搭配化学引诱剂使用的诱捕器(灭蚊磁体诱捕器)用Lurex(L-乳酸)和辛醇(1-辛烯-3-醇)商业诱饵诱捕,这两种诱饵是已知对白纹伊蚊有吸引力的物质。6×6拉丁方试验重复进行3次,共捕获37237只蚊子,其中5280只(14.2%)是白纹伊蚊。从实验性诱捕器和商用诱捕器捕获的白纹伊蚊显著更多(P < 0.05)(4244/5280;80.3%),多于从CDC诱蚊灯和特定于伊蚊的诱捕器捕获的数量。灭蚊磁体自由版诱捕器捕获的白纹伊蚊最多(1591只),占总捕获量的30.1%,紧随其后的是灭蚊磁体-X诱捕器(1468只)和灭蚊磁体专业版诱捕器(1185只)。全向费-普林斯顿诱捕器的表现优于CDC诱蚊灯或威尔顿诱捕器。在这些试验中捕获了27种蚊子,其中9种数量足够多,可进行有意义的分析。白纹伊蚊是捕获的第二常见蚊子。这些试验结果表明,以丙烷为动力的商用诱捕器可作为CDC诱捕器的有用替代品,用于白纹伊蚊的监测工作。文中讨论了有利于捕获白纹伊蚊和其他蚊子种类的诱捕器特性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验