Baguet J P, Asmar R, Valensi P, Nisse-Durgeat S, Mallion J M
Clinique de Cardiologie, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5(1):175-83. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s3409. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
In hypertension and diabetes, early structural changes of the arterial wall precede or support atherosclerosis. There is evidence that some antihypertensive drugs exert an antiathero-sclerotic effect. Over 36 months, we investigated the effect of candesartan cilexetil (CC) on the common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) vs amlodipine besylate (AML) in patients with type 2 diabetes and mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 4-week wash-out period, 209 patients were randomized to either CC 8 mg or AML 5 mg once daily for a minimum of 1 month, after which, if BP was not normalized, the dosage was doubled, followed by the addition of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg if necessary. No significant differences were observed between the two groups for change in IMT at M12 (-0.001 vs -0.027 mm/year for CC and AML respectively, p = 0.425), at M24 (-0.033 vs -0.019 mm per year respectively, p = 0.442), and at the last visit (-0.016 vs -0.039 mm per year respectively, p = 0.549). Within the group, comparisons did not show a significant difference in changes in IMT from baseline to the three visits. At the last visit, IMT regression was observed in 52.2% of patients receiving CC and in 51.3% of those receiving AML (p = 0.908). The augmentation in carotid lumen diameter from baseline was statistically greater in the AML group at the last visit (p = 0.034). BP variations during the study were similar in the two groups. The results of this study show that CC and AML treatments may alter identically the natural progression of carotid IMT in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients.
在高血压和糖尿病中,动脉壁的早期结构变化先于或促进动脉粥样硬化。有证据表明,一些抗高血压药物具有抗动脉粥样硬化作用。在36个月的时间里,我们研究了坎地沙坦酯(CC)与苯磺酸氨氯地平(AML)对2型糖尿病合并轻至中度原发性高血压患者颈总动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)的影响。经过4周的洗脱期后,209例患者被随机分为每日一次服用8mg CC或5mg AML,至少服用1个月,之后,如果血压未恢复正常,则将剂量加倍,必要时加用12.5mg氢氯噻嗪。两组在第12个月时IMT变化(CC组和AML组分别为-0.001和-0.027mm/年,p = 0.425)、第24个月时(分别为-0.033和-0.019mm/年,p = 0.442)以及最后一次随访时(分别为-0.016和-0.039mm/年,p = 0.549)均未观察到显著差异。在组内,从基线到三次随访时IMT变化的比较未显示出显著差异。在最后一次随访时,接受CC治疗的患者中有52.2%观察到IMT消退,接受AML治疗的患者中有51.3%观察到IMT消退(p = 0.908)。在最后一次随访时,AML组颈管直径相对于基线的增加在统计学上更显著(p = 0.034)。研究期间两组的血压变化相似。本研究结果表明,CC和AML治疗可能同样改变2型糖尿病高血压患者颈动脉IMT的自然进展。