Narayanasamy A
Nurse Educ Today. 1991 Oct;11(5):341-6. doi: 10.1016/0260-6917(91)90033-7.
In Part 1 of this paper the focus was on Performance Indicators (PIs) related to staff performance, teaching methods and learning environment, and it was argued that notions of student reports, student reviews and student perceptions would be useful as PIs when Colleges of Nursing are evaluated for effectiveness. In Part 2 the failure to apply indicators such as unit costs, student/staff ratio (SSRs), wastage and completion rates and value-added scores is discussed. Further argument is advanced to justify the application of these indicators to nurse education. The conclusion of this paper is that until concepts such as unit-costs, SSRs, wastage and completion rates and value-added scores are developed into PIs in nurse education, Colleges of Nursing are not sufficiently evaluated for their effectiveness.
在本文的第一部分，重点关注了与员工绩效、教学方法和学习环境相关的绩效指标（PIs），并认为在评估护理学院的有效性时，学生报告、学生评价和学生认知等概念作为绩效指标会很有用。在第二部分中，讨论了未应用诸如单位成本、学生/员工比率（SSRs）、浪费率、完成率和增值分数等指标的情况。进一步阐述理由以证明将这些指标应用于护理教育的合理性。本文的结论是，在诸如单位成本、SSRs、浪费率、完成率和增值分数等概念在护理教育中发展成为绩效指标之前，护理学院的有效性没有得到充分评估。
