Chaudhaery Shailendra S, Roy Kuldeep K, Saxena Anil K
Medicinal and Process Chemistry Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India 226001.
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Jun;49(6):1590-601. doi: 10.1021/ci900049e.
In view of the nonavailability of complete X-ray structure of carbamates cocrystallized with AChE enzyme, the 3D-QSAR model development based on cocrystallized conformer (CCBA) as well as docked conformer-based alignment (DCBA) is not feasible. Therefore, the only two alternatives viz. pharmacophore and maximum common substructure-based alignments are left for the 3D-QSAR comparative molecular field analyses (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analyses (CoMSIA) model development. So, in the present study, the 3D-QSAR models have been developed using both alignment methods, where CoMFA and CoMSIA models based on pharmacophore-based alignment were in good agreement with each other and demonstrated significant superiority over MCS-based alignment in terms of leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validated q(2) values of 0.573 and 0.723 and the r(2) values of 0.972 and 0.950, respectively. The validation of the best CoMFA and CoMSIA models based on pharmacophore (Hip-Hop)-based alignment on a test set of 17 compounds provided significant predictive r(2) [r(2)(pred(test))] of 0.614 and 0.788, respectively. The contour map analyses revealed the relative importance of steric, electrostatic, and hydrophobicity for AChE inhibition activity. However, hydrophobic factor plays a major contribution to the AChE inhibitory activity modulation which is in strong agreement with the fact that the AChE is having a wide active site gorge (approximately 20 A) occupied by a large number of hydrophobic amino acid residues.
鉴于与乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)共结晶的氨基甲酸酯类化合物的完整X射线结构无法获得,基于共结晶构象异构体(CCBA)以及基于对接构象异构体的比对(DCBA)来开发3D-QSAR模型是不可行的。因此,对于3D-QSAR比较分子场分析(CoMFA)和比较分子相似性指数分析(CoMSIA)模型开发而言,仅剩下药效团和基于最大共同子结构的比对这两种方法。所以,在本研究中,使用这两种比对方法开发了3D-QSAR模型,其中基于药效团比对的CoMFA和CoMSIA模型彼此高度一致,并且在留一法(LOO)交叉验证的q(2)值分别为0.573和0.723以及r(2)值分别为0.972和0.950方面,相较于基于最大共同子结构的比对显示出显著优势。基于药效团(嘻哈)比对的最佳CoMFA和CoMSIA模型在由17种化合物组成的测试集上的验证分别提供了显著的预测r(2) [r(2)(pred(test))]值,分别为0.614和0.788。等高线图分析揭示了空间、静电和疏水性对AChE抑制活性的相对重要性。然而,疏水因子对AChE抑制活性调节起主要作用,这与AChE具有一个被大量疏水氨基酸残基占据的宽活性位点峡谷(约20埃)这一事实高度一致。