Teasell Robert, Meyer Matthew J, McClure Andrew, Pan Cheng, Murie-Fernandez Manuel, Foley Norine, Salter Katherine
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Joseph's Health Care, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, Aging, Rehabilitation and Geriatric Care Program, Lawson Health Reserach Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):44-56. doi: 10.1310/tsr1601-44.
There is a revolution underway in stroke rehabilitation. International comparative studies coupled with an impressive evidence base have provided a platform from which an ideal system for stroke rehabilitation can be envisioned. Using the concepts of structure and process of care, different systems of stroke rehabilitation can be compared and evaluated against best evidence. Two structures of care are examined: specialized interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation units and outpatient programs. Although specialized interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation units remain the "gold standard" of care, access to them is often limited. Outpatient programs are essential to stroke rehabilitation systems of care; however, while some countries are investing in outpatient programs, others are scaling back. Even though structures of care have been shown to affect processes of care, it is the processes of care that have proven to be more influential in altering patient outcomes. Four key processes of care are examined: time to admission, intensity of therapy, task-specific therapy, and discharge planning. Within international stroke rehabilitation systems, differences in these processes have resulted in significant differences in outcomes. This allows for "real-world" comparisons of how differing processes affect patient outcomes. Those systems whose structures and processes of care best reflect current best evidence appear to achieve better outcomes.
中风康复领域正在进行一场变革。国际比较研究以及令人瞩目的证据基础提供了一个平台,据此可以构想一个理想的中风康复系统。运用护理结构和流程的概念,不同的中风康复系统能够对照最佳证据进行比较和评估。本文考察了两种护理结构:专门的跨学科中风康复单元和门诊项目。尽管专门的跨学科中风康复单元仍是护理的“金标准”,但患者获得此类服务的机会往往有限。门诊项目对于中风康复护理系统至关重要;然而,一些国家在投资门诊项目,而另一些国家却在缩减规模。尽管护理结构已被证明会影响护理流程,但事实证明,护理流程对改变患者预后更具影响力。本文考察了四个关键护理流程:入院时间、治疗强度、特定任务治疗和出院计划。在国际中风康复系统中,这些流程的差异导致了预后的显著差异。这使得我们能够对不同流程如何影响患者预后进行“现实世界”的比较。那些护理结构和流程最能反映当前最佳证据的系统似乎能取得更好的预后。