Lu Jonathan C T, Coca Steven G, Patel Uptal D, Cantley Lloyd, Parikh Chirag R
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jun;4(6):1020-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05411008. Epub 2009 May 14.
Identifying patients who may develop acute kidney injury (AKI) remains challenging, as clinical determinants explain only a portion of individual risk. Another factor that likely affects risk is intrinsic genetic variability. Therefore, a systematic review of studies was performed that related the development or prognosis of AKI to genetic variation.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, HuGEnet, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched for articles from 1950 to Dec 2007. Two independent researchers screened articles using predetermined criteria. Studies were assessed for methodological quality via an aggregate scoring system.
The 16 included studies were of cohort or case-cohort design and investigated 35 polymorphisms in 21 genes in association with AKI. Fifteen gene-gene interactions were also investigated in four separate studies. Study populations were primarily premature infants or adults who were critically ill or postcardiac bypass patients. Among the studies, five different definitions of AKI were used. Only one polymorphism, APO E e2/e3/e4, had greater than one study showing a significant impact (P < 0.05) on AKI incidence. The mean quality score of 5.8/10 (range four to nine), heterogeneity in the studies, and the dearth of studies precluded additional meta-analysis of the results.
Current association studies are unable to provide definitive evidence linking genetic variation to AKI. Future success will require a narrow consensus definition of AKI, rigorous epidemiologic techniques, and a shift from a priori hypothesis-driven to genome-wide association studies.
识别可能发生急性肾损伤(AKI)的患者仍然具有挑战性,因为临床决定因素仅能解释部分个体风险。另一个可能影响风险的因素是内在基因变异性。因此,我们对有关AKI发生或预后与基因变异关系的研究进行了系统综述。
设计、研究地点、参与者与测量方法:检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、HuGEnet、SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库中1950年至2007年12月的文章。两名独立研究人员使用预定标准筛选文章。通过综合评分系统评估研究的方法学质量。
纳入的16项研究采用队列或病例队列设计,研究了21个基因中的35个多态性与AKI的相关性。在四项独立研究中还调查了15种基因-基因相互作用。研究人群主要是早产儿或危重症成人或心脏搭桥术后患者。在这些研究中,使用了五种不同的AKI定义。只有一种多态性,即载脂蛋白E(APO E)的e2/e3/e4,有超过一项研究显示对AKI发病率有显著影响(P < 0.05)。研究的平均质量评分为5.8/10(范围为4至9),研究中的异质性以及研究数量不足使得无法对结果进行进一步的荟萃分析。
目前的关联研究无法提供将基因变异与AKI联系起来的确切证据。未来的成功需要对AKI有一个狭义的共识定义、严谨的流行病学技术,以及从先验假设驱动的研究转向全基因组关联研究。