Ku Leighton
Department of Health Policy, The George Washington University, 2021 K St NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jul;99(7):1322-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.144733. Epub 2009 May 14.
I examined insurance coverage and medical expenditures of both immigrant and US-born adults to determine the extent to which immigrants contribute to US medical expenditures.
I used data from the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to perform 2-part multivariate analyses of medical expenditures, controlling for health status, insurance coverage, race/ethnicity, and other sociodemographic factors.
Approximately 44% of recent immigrants and 63% of established immigrants were fully insured over the 12-month period analyzed. Immigrants' per-person unadjusted medical expenditures were approximately one half to two thirds as high as expenditures for the US born, even when immigrants were fully insured. Recent immigrants were responsible for only about 1% of public medical expenditures even though they constituted 5% of the population. After controlling for other factors, I found that immigrants' medical costs averaged about 14% to 20% less than those who were US born.
Insured immigrants had much lower medical expenses than insured US-born citizens, even after the effects of insurance coverage were controlled. This suggests that immigrants' insurance premiums may be cross-subsidizing care for the US-born. If so, health care resources could be redirected back to immigrants to improve their care.
我研究了移民和美国本土出生的成年人的保险覆盖情况及医疗支出,以确定移民对美国医疗支出的贡献程度。
我使用了2003年医疗支出小组调查的数据,对医疗支出进行两部分的多变量分析,控制健康状况、保险覆盖情况、种族/族裔以及其他社会人口因素。
在分析的12个月期间,约44%的新移民和63%的常住移民享有全面保险。即使移民享有全面保险,其人均未经调整的医疗支出也仅约为美国本土出生者支出的二分之一至三分之二。新移民仅占公共医疗支出的约1%,尽管他们占人口的5%。在控制其他因素后,我发现移民的医疗费用平均比美国本土出生者低约14%至20%。
即使在控制了保险覆盖的影响之后,参保移民的医疗费用仍远低于参保的美国本土公民。这表明移民的保险费可能在为美国本土出生者的医疗保健提供交叉补贴。如果是这样,医疗保健资源可以重新导向移民,以改善他们的医疗保健。