Institute of Gerontology & Department of Healthcare Sciences, Wayne State University, Room 240, Knapp Bldg, 87 East Ferry Street, Detroit, MI, USA.
Institute of Gerontology & Department of Economics, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Apr;8(2):363-374. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00790-y. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
Immigrants to the USA have disparate access to health insurance coverage and healthcare services. We evaluate the effects of gaining insurance following the January 2014 Affordable Care Act's (ACA) key provisions implementation on health services use among foreign- (FB) and US-born (USB) adults.
Longitudinal data from two panels (2013/2014 and 2014/2015) of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey on FB and USB adults, ages 26-64 (unweighted n = 15,232), and difference-in-differences analysis using generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the effects of insurance gain. The primary outcomes were five measures of healthcare utilization including yearly routine care appointment, annual number of physician office visits, annual number of prescription medications filled or refilled, use of the emergency department (ED) during the year, and having an inpatient hospital stay during the year.
Immigrants were more likely to gain health insurance between 2013 and 2015 relative to USB adults (6.3% vs. 4.4%) but remained much more likely to be continuously uninsured by 2015 (20.8% vs. 6.4%). Controlling for sociodemographic and health characteristics, FB and USB adults who gained insurance increased their use of health services, including routine care (absolute change Δ = 15.7%; p < 0.001 and Δ = 11.7%; p < 0.001), office-based doctor visits (Δ = 1.3; p < 0.001 and Δ = 0.6; p < 0.001), prescribed medications (Δ = 2.5; p < 0.001 and Δ = 1.6; p = 0.016), and inpatient hospitalizations (Δ = 3.6%; p = 0.017 and Δ = 3%; p < 0.001). ED use increased only among the FB (Δ = 4.8%; p < 0.001). Gaining insurance eliminated the differences in health services use for all considered outcomes among the FB relative to the continuously insured USB.
US immigrants had notable gains in health insurance after the ACA provisions took full effect, but major disparities in coverage persist. If insurance continues to expand among immigrants, then the gains may reduce longstanding disparities in health services use and enhance primary and preventive healthcare.
移民到美国的人在获得医疗保险覆盖范围和医疗服务方面存在差异。我们评估了 2014 年 1 月平价医疗法案(ACA)主要条款实施后获得保险对外国出生(FB)和美国出生(USB)成年人健康服务使用的影响。
使用来自医疗支出面板调查的两个面板(2013/2014 年和 2014/2015 年)的纵向数据,对 26-64 岁的 FB 和 USB 成年人(未加权 n=15232)进行分析,使用广义估计方程进行差异中的差异分析,以估计保险收益的影响。主要结果是包括每年常规护理预约、每年医生就诊次数、每年处方药物的数量或补充数量、当年使用急诊部(ED)和当年住院治疗在内的五项医疗保健使用措施。
与 USB 成年人相比,移民在 2013 年至 2015 年期间更有可能获得医疗保险(6.3%对 4.4%),但到 2015 年,他们仍然更有可能持续没有保险(20.8%对 6.4%)。控制社会人口统计学和健康特征后,获得保险的 FB 和 USB 成年人增加了他们对医疗服务的使用,包括常规护理(绝对变化Δ=15.7%;p<0.001和Δ=11.7%;p<0.001)、门诊医生就诊(Δ=1.3;p<0.001和Δ=0.6;p<0.001)、处方药物(Δ=2.5;p<0.001和Δ=1.6;p=0.016)和住院治疗(Δ=3.6%;p=0.017 和Δ=3%;p<0.001)。ED 使用仅在 FB 中增加(Δ=4.8%;p<0.001)。获得保险消除了 FB 相对于连续保险的 USB 在所有考虑的结果中在医疗服务使用方面的差异。
ACA 条款全面生效后,美国移民在医疗保险方面取得了显著进展,但覆盖范围仍存在重大差距。如果移民的保险继续扩大,那么这些收益可能会减少长期存在的医疗服务使用差距,并加强初级和预防保健。