Suppr超能文献

尿路感染:预防还是不预防?

Urinary tract infections: to prophylaxis or not to prophylaxis?

作者信息

Montini Giovanni, Hewitt Ian

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1605-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-009-1213-y. Epub 2009 May 15.

Abstract

Urinary tract infections, with or without reflux, are the most frequent reason for long-term antibacterial prophylaxis in infants and children. When one is considering the use of prophylaxis in these children, what is clear from existing published data? Up to 2006 there were a small number of poor quality studies, with no reliable evidence of the effectiveness of antibiotics in preventing recurrent symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Since then, four randomised controlled studies, to assess the benefits, or lack thereof, of antibiotic prophylaxis, have been published. None has demonstrated a clear benefit. The following conclusions can be drawn: antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated for children following a first febrile UTI if no or mild grade I or II reflux is present; for higher grade reflux there is no definite conclusion.

摘要

无论有无尿液反流,尿路感染都是婴幼儿和儿童长期使用抗菌药物进行预防的最常见原因。当考虑对这些儿童使用预防性治疗时,现有已发表的数据表明了什么?截至2006年,仅有少量质量欠佳的研究,没有可靠证据证明抗生素在预防复发性症状性尿路感染(UTI)方面的有效性。自那时起,已发表了四项评估抗生素预防作用利弊的随机对照研究。没有一项研究表明有明显益处。可以得出以下结论:首次发热性UTI后,如果不存在或仅有轻度I级或II级反流,儿童无需进行抗生素预防;对于更高级别的反流,尚无明确结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验