Montini Giovanni, Hewitt Ian
Pediatr Nephrol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1605-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-009-1213-y. Epub 2009 May 15.
Urinary tract infections, with or without reflux, are the most frequent reason for long-term antibacterial prophylaxis in infants and children. When one is considering the use of prophylaxis in these children, what is clear from existing published data? Up to 2006 there were a small number of poor quality studies, with no reliable evidence of the effectiveness of antibiotics in preventing recurrent symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Since then, four randomised controlled studies, to assess the benefits, or lack thereof, of antibiotic prophylaxis, have been published. None has demonstrated a clear benefit. The following conclusions can be drawn: antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated for children following a first febrile UTI if no or mild grade I or II reflux is present; for higher grade reflux there is no definite conclusion.
无论有无尿液反流,尿路感染都是婴幼儿和儿童长期使用抗菌药物进行预防的最常见原因。当考虑对这些儿童使用预防性治疗时,现有已发表的数据表明了什么?截至2006年,仅有少量质量欠佳的研究,没有可靠证据证明抗生素在预防复发性症状性尿路感染(UTI)方面的有效性。自那时起,已发表了四项评估抗生素预防作用利弊的随机对照研究。没有一项研究表明有明显益处。可以得出以下结论:首次发热性UTI后,如果不存在或仅有轻度I级或II级反流,儿童无需进行抗生素预防;对于更高级别的反流,尚无明确结论。