Smith Neil, Weyman Donna, Findlay George, Martin Ian, Carter Simon, Utley Martin, Treasure Tom
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death, NCEPOD, 4-8 Maple Street, London W1T 5HD, UK.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Aug;36(2):340-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.048. Epub 2009 May 14.
Trauma is the leading cause of death in the first four decades of life in western countries. A national prospective study was conducted in the UK to examine the process and quality of care of severely injured patients. We present a previously unpublished analysis of the severity of injury, place of treatment, quality of care and survival amongst patients with thoracic injuries.
All UK hospitals with an emergency department were asked to provide prespecified clinical and process data on all patients presenting with significant injuries between 1st February and 30th April 2006. All data were stripped of patient, clinician and institutional identifiers before review by expert advisors.
Data adequate for analysis were obtained on 1735 of 2203 injured patients reported. An injury severity score (ISS) > or = 16, the threshold for severe injury, was derived from case records of 795 patients, who comprise the study denominator. Of these, 387 (49%) had a thoracic injury, usually as part of polytrauma. The mortality rate was 8% (of 13) 9% (of 23) 10% (of 175) 14% (of 136) 22% (of 37) and 100% (of 3) for the six ascending grades of severity for the thoracic component of the ISS score. One hundred and seventy-six of the 795 patients (22%) had a thoracic injury sufficient for them to be classified as severely injured regardless of any other injuries. The quality of care as assessed by expert advisors showed an apparent association with overall trauma volume of the 142 treating hospitals. For patients with thoracic injuries where the specialty of the team in charge could be identified (n = 284/387) trauma and orthopaedics (T and O) cared for 36%, critical medicine 22%, general surgery 19%, neurosurgery 8% and only 5% were in the care of thoracic surgeons. One or more chest drains were inserted in 203/795 (26%) of patients, few of them by thoracic surgeons.
Given that polytrauma patients rarely come under the care of thoracic surgeons and yet frequently have severe thoracic injuries there is a clear need for T and O surgeons and generalists to have a good grounding in thoracic procedures.
在西方国家,创伤是40岁前人群的首要死因。英国开展了一项全国性前瞻性研究,以调查重伤患者的救治过程及质量。我们对胸部损伤患者的损伤严重程度、治疗地点、医疗质量及存活情况进行了一项此前未发表的分析。
要求英国所有设有急诊科的医院提供2006年2月1日至4月30日期间所有重伤患者的预先指定临床及过程数据。在专家顾问审核前,所有数据均已去除患者、临床医生及机构标识符。
在报告的2203例受伤患者中,获取了1735例可用于分析的数据。795例患者的病例记录得出损伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥16(重伤阈值),这些患者构成研究分母。其中,387例(49%)有胸部损伤,通常为多发伤的一部分。ISS评分胸部部分严重程度的六个等级中,死亡率分别为8%(13例中的)、9%(23例中的)、10%(175例中的)、14%(136例中的)、22%(37例中的)和100%(3例中的)。795例患者中有176例(22%)胸部损伤严重到足以被归类为重伤,无论是否有其他损伤。专家顾问评估的医疗质量与142家治疗医院的总体创伤量存在明显关联。对于能确定负责团队专业的胸部损伤患者(n = 284/387),创伤与骨科(T和O)护理了36%,重症医学护理了22%,普通外科护理了19%,神经外科护理了8%,只有5%由胸外科医生护理。203/795(26%)的患者插入了一根或多根胸管,其中很少是由胸外科医生操作的。
鉴于多发伤患者很少由胸外科医生护理,但经常有严重的胸部损伤,显然T和O外科医生及全科医生需要扎实掌握胸部手术操作。