Suppr超能文献

卵裂期单胚胎移植与双胚胎移植后活产和多胎妊娠的可能性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, IVF Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2010 Aug;94(3):936-45. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a policy of elective single-embryo transfer (e-SET) lowers the multiple birth rate without compromising the live birth rate.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine and IVF unit.

PATIENT(S): None.

INTERVENTION(S): Searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Meta-register for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCISEARCH with no limitation on language and publication year, 1974 to 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

randomized, controlled trials comparing e-SET with double-embryo transfer (DET) for live birth and multiple birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Nonrandomized trials and studies that included only patients who had blastocyst transfer were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The likelihood of live birth per patient and multiple birth per total number of live births. Other outcomes included implantation rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate per patient, and preterm delivery rate per live birth.

RESULT(S): Six trials (n=1354 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with DET, the e-SET policy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the probability of live birth (RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72) and multiple birth (RR 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.18).

CONCLUSION(S): Elective-SET of embryos at the cleavage stage reduces the likelihood of live birth by 38% and multiple birth by 94%. Evidence from randomized, controlled trials suggests that increasing the number of e-SET attempts (fresh and/or frozen) results in a cumulative live birth rate similar to that of DET. Offering subfertile women three cycles of IVF will have a major impact on the uptake of an e-SET policy.

摘要

目的

确定选择性单胚胎移植(e-SET)政策是否可以降低多胎率,同时不影响活产率。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

地点

生殖医学三级转诊中心和 IVF 单位。

患者

无。

干预

对 Cochrane 对照试验注册库、随机对照试验元注册库(RCTs)、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 SCISEARCH 进行了无语言和出版年限限制的检索,检索时间为 1974 年至 2008 年。

选择标准

比较 e-SET 与双胚胎移植(DET)对体外受精(IVF)后活产率和多胎率的随机对照试验(RCT)。排除非随机试验和仅包括进行囊胚移植患者的研究。

主要观察指标

每位患者的活产可能性和每例活产的多胎可能性。其他结局包括种植率、妊娠率、流产和异位妊娠率、临床妊娠率、每位患者的持续妊娠率以及每例活产的早产率。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了 6 项试验(n=1354 例患者)。与 DET 相比,e-SET 方案与活产概率降低具有统计学意义相关(RR 0.62;95% CI,0.53-0.72)和多胎(RR 0.06;95% CI,0.02-0.18)。

结论

卵裂期胚胎的选择性 SET 可使活产的可能性降低 38%,多胎的可能性降低 94%。来自随机对照试验的证据表明,增加 e-SET 尝试次数(新鲜和/或冷冻)可导致累积活产率与 DET 相似。为不孕妇女提供三个周期的 IVF 将对采用 e-SET 政策产生重大影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验