Suppr超能文献

运用动机性访谈技巧提高引导式自助行为减肥治疗的效果。

The use of motivational interviewing techniques to enhance the efficacy of guided self-help behavioral weight loss treatment.

作者信息

DiMarco Ilyse Dobrow, Klein Dena A, Clark Vicki L, Wilson G Terence

机构信息

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Department of Psychology, Psychology Building, Busch Campus, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, United States.

出版信息

Eat Behav. 2009 Apr;10(2):134-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Feb 15.

Abstract

This study assessed whether motivational interviewing (MI), applied as part of a standard guided self-help (GSH) behavioral weight loss treatment, reduced attrition rate and improved participant weight loss and other eating-related and general psychological measures, relative to a standard GSH treatment alone. Thirty-nine overweight patients (7 males, 32 females) were randomized to receive either 6 sessions of traditional guided self-help and 2 traditional motivation-focused sessions (GSH treatment); or 6 guided self-help sessions and 2 sessions utilizing an MI approach to motivation (GSH/MI treatment). In intention-to-treat analyses, significant differences were found in the areas of eating concern and control over eating, favoring GSH/MI. Between-group effect size estimates indicated a small advantage for GSH/MI over GSH in weight loss, as well as on a number of secondary eating-related measures. Implications and future directions are discussed.

摘要

本研究评估了作为标准引导式自助(GSH)行为减肥治疗一部分的动机性访谈(MI),相对于单独的标准GSH治疗,是否能降低脱落率,并改善参与者的体重减轻以及其他与饮食相关和一般心理指标。39名超重患者(7名男性,32名女性)被随机分配接受6次传统引导式自助和2次传统动机聚焦治疗(GSH治疗);或6次引导式自助治疗和2次采用MI方法进行动机干预的治疗(GSH/MI治疗)。在意向性分析中,发现在饮食关注和饮食控制方面存在显著差异,GSH/MI治疗更具优势。组间效应量估计表明,GSH/MI在体重减轻以及一些次要的饮食相关指标上比GSH略有优势。文中讨论了研究的意义和未来方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验