Suppr超能文献

康纳斯 CP 测验的因子结构的有效性。

Validity of the factor structure of Conners' CPT.

机构信息

Department of Research, Vestfold Mental Health Care Trust, Box 2267, N-3103 Tønsberg, Norway.

出版信息

J Atten Disord. 2010 Jan;13(4):347-57. doi: 10.1177/1087054709332477.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A previous factor analysis of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CCPT) indicates that the test measures 5 sub-functions of attention, namely focused attention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, sustained attention, vigilance, and change in control. The present study further analyzes the results from Egeland & Kowalik-Gran to test the construct- and criterion-validity of these factors.

METHOD

Construct validity is tested by analyzing whether clinical groups known to be impaired in specified subprocesses actually differ with regard to factor scores. Comparison of CCPT factor scores from 282 individuals with ADHD, schizophrenia, affective disorders, brain injury, language disorders, and normal individuals gives validity to 4 factors, but not to the vigilance factor.

RESULTS

Other tests of controlled attention correlate only with focused attention, thus giving criterion validity to this factor and differential validity to the remaining 4 factors.

CONCLUSION

Grouping scores on the CCPT into 4 or 5 sub-functions of attention may provide the clinician with a tool to differentiate between clinical groups.

摘要

目的

先前对康纳斯持续操作测验(CCPT)的因子分析表明,该测验可测量注意力的 5 个子功能,即专注注意力、多动/冲动、持续注意力、警惕性和控制变化。本研究进一步分析了 Egeland 和 Kowalik-Gran 的结果,以测试这些因素的结构效度和效标效度。

方法

结构效度通过分析已知在特定子过程中受损的临床群体在因子分数上是否确实存在差异来检验。对 282 名患有注意缺陷多动障碍、精神分裂症、情感障碍、脑损伤、语言障碍和正常个体的 CCPT 因子分数进行比较,为 4 个因子提供了有效性,但不能为警惕性因子提供有效性。

结果

其他对受控注意力的测试仅与专注注意力相关,因此为该因素提供了效标效度,并为其余 4 个因素提供了区分效度。

结论

将 CCPT 的分数分为注意力的 4 或 5 个子功能,可能为临床医生提供一种工具,以区分不同的临床群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验