• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑肿瘤评估中的最小表观扩散系数

Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors.

作者信息

Kitis Omer, Altay Hakan, Calli Cem, Yunten Nilgun, Akalin Taner, Yurtseven Taskin

机构信息

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2005 Sep;55(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.004
PMID:16129247
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether diffusion-weighted imaging by using minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC(min)) values could differentiate various brain tumors including gliomas, metastases, and lymphomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 65 patients with histologically or clinically diagnosed brain tumors (12 low-grade gliomas, 31 high-grade gliomas, 14 metastatic tumors, and 8 lymphomas) using a 1.5 T MR unit. On diffusion-weighted imaging, the ADC(min) values were measured within the tumors and mean values were evaluated regarding statistical differences between groups.

RESULTS

The ADC(min) values of low-grade gliomas (1.09+/-0.20 x 10(-3)mm(2)/s) were significantly higher (p<.001) than those of other tumors. There were no statistical significant differences between glioblastomas (0.70+/-0.16 mm(2)/s), anaplastic astrocytomas (0.77+/-0.21 mm(2)/s), metastases (0.78+/-0.21 mm(2)/s), and lymphomas. But, lymphomas had lower mean ADC(min) values (0.54+/-0.10mm(2)/s) than high-grade gliomas and metastases.

CONCLUSION

The ADC measurements may help to differentiate low-grade gliomas from high-grade gliomas, metastases, and lymphomas. Although there is no statistical difference, lymphomas seem to have marked restriction in diffusion coefficients.

摘要

目的

确定使用最小表观扩散系数(ADC(min))值的扩散加权成像是否能够区分包括胶质瘤、转移瘤和淋巴瘤在内的各种脑肿瘤。

材料与方法

我们使用1.5T磁共振设备检查了65例经组织学或临床诊断为脑肿瘤的患者(12例低级别胶质瘤、31例高级别胶质瘤、14例转移瘤和8例淋巴瘤)。在扩散加权成像上,测量肿瘤内的ADC(min)值,并评估各组之间的平均值有无统计学差异。

结果

低级别胶质瘤的ADC(min)值(1.09±0.20×10(-3)mm(2)/s)显著高于其他肿瘤(p<0.001)。胶质母细胞瘤(0.70±0.16mm(2)/s)、间变性星形细胞瘤(0.77±0.21mm(2)/s)、转移瘤(0.78±0.21mm(2)/s)和淋巴瘤之间无统计学显著差异。但是,淋巴瘤的平均ADC(min)值(0.54±0.10mm(2)/s)低于高级别胶质瘤和转移瘤。

结论

ADC测量可能有助于区分低级别胶质瘤与高级别胶质瘤、转移瘤和淋巴瘤。尽管无统计学差异,但淋巴瘤在扩散系数方面似乎有明显受限。

相似文献

1
Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors.脑肿瘤评估中的最小表观扩散系数
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Sep;55(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.004.
2
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.定量表观扩散系数在脑肿瘤及相关瘤周水肿特征描述中的应用
Acta Radiol. 2009 Jul;50(6):682-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850902933123.
3
Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors.增强型恶性脑肿瘤的灌注与扩散磁共振成像
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jun;58(3):394-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.032. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
4
[Diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of brain abscesses and necrotic tumors].[扩散加权磁共振成像在脑脓肿与坏死性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用]
Tani Girisim Radyol. 2004 Jun;10(2):110-8.
5
Diffusion-tensor imaging for glioma grading at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging: analysis of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity.3-T磁共振成像下用于胶质瘤分级的扩散张量成像:分数各向异性和平均扩散率分析
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2):298-303. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318076b44d.
6
Magnetic resonance imaging of pilocytic astrocytomas: usefulness of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for differentiation from high-grade gliomas.毛细胞型星形细胞瘤的磁共振成像:最小表观扩散系数(ADC)值在与高级别胶质瘤鉴别中的应用价值
Acta Radiol. 2008 May;49(4):462-7. doi: 10.1080/02841850801918555.
7
Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.淋巴瘤和胶质母细胞瘤:3T 高 b 值扩散加权磁共振成像评估表观扩散系数的差异。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
8
Predicting the histopathological grade of cerebral gliomas using high b value MR DW imaging at 3-tesla.使用3特斯拉高b值磁共振扩散加权成像预测脑胶质瘤的组织病理学分级
J Neuroimaging. 2008 Jul;18(3):276-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00263.x. Epub 2008 May 5.
9
Distinction between recurrent glioma and radiation injury using magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging.利用磁共振波谱结合扩散加权成像鉴别复发性胶质瘤与放射性损伤
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 May 1;68(1):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
10
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation times in characterizing contrast enhancing brain tumors and regions of peritumoral edema.定量表观扩散系数和T2弛豫时间在鉴别强化脑肿瘤及瘤周水肿区域中的应用
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jun;21(6):701-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20335.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of ADC values of adult brain tumors with the diagnosis and pathological grade: A cross-sectional multicenter study.成人脑肿瘤表观扩散系数值与诊断及病理分级的相关性:一项横断面多中心研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;7(6):e2110. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2110. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The Role of Multimodal Imaging in Differentiating Vasogenic from Infiltrative Edema: A Systematic Review.多模态成像在区分血管源性水肿与浸润性水肿中的作用:一项系统评价
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023 Aug 21;33(4):514-521. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772466. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
The Use of F-FET-PET-MRI in Neuro-Oncology: The Best of Both Worlds-A Narrative Review.
F-FET-PET-MRI在神经肿瘤学中的应用:两全其美——一篇叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 11;12(5):1202. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051202.
4
Prediction of Malignant Transformation of WHO II Astrocytoma Using Mathematical Models Incorporating Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Contrast Enhancement.使用结合表观扩散系数和对比增强的数学模型预测世界卫生组织II级星形细胞瘤的恶性转化
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 29;11:744827. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744827. eCollection 2021.
5
Differentiating Between Low- and High-grade Glioma Tumors Measuring Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Various Regions of the Brain.通过测量脑不同区域的表观扩散系数值来鉴别低级别和高级别胶质瘤肿瘤
Oman Med J. 2021 Mar 31;36(2):e251. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.59. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Classification of paediatric brain tumours by diffusion weighted imaging and machine learning.基于弥散加权成像和机器学习的小儿脑肿瘤分类。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):2987. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82214-3.
7
Parotid gland tumors: comparison of conventional and diffusion-weighted MRI findings with histopathological results.腮腺肿瘤:常规 MRI 与弥散加权 MRI 表现与组织病理学结果的对比研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 May 1;50(4):20200391. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200391. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in differentiation of malignant intra-axial brain tumors.表观扩散系数测量在鉴别恶性脑内肿瘤中的诊断效能。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Feb 26;51(1):256-267. doi: 10.3906/sag-2006-1.
9
Multiparametric MRI: practical approach and pictorial review of a useful tool in the evaluation of brain tumours and tumour-like lesions.多参数磁共振成像:评估脑肿瘤和肿瘤样病变的实用工具的实际应用与影像学综述
Insights Imaging. 2020 Jul 17;11(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00888-1.
10
Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging, MR Perfusion, and MR Spectroscopy in Addition to Conventional MR Imaging in Intracranial Space-occupying Lesions.除传统磁共振成像外,扩散加权磁共振成像、磁共振灌注成像和磁共振波谱成像在颅内占位性病变中的诊断价值
Cureus. 2019 Dec 18;11(12):e6409. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6409.