Lin Zhenyu, Huang Lu, Chen Guonan
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Analysis and Detection Technology for Food Safety, Department of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Se Pu. 2009 Jan;27(1):9-18.
Capillary electrophoresis (CE) and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) have some outstanding advantages, such as less sample consumption and high separation efficiency. Coupled with different detection modes, such as ultraviolet detection, laser-induced fluorescence, amperometry, conductometry, mass spectrometry, and various sample preconcentration methods, CE and CEC have been accepted by more and more analysts in the detections of pesticide residues. This review focuses on the comparison of the merits and demerits of various detection modes in pesticide residue detections. The preconcentration methods of pesticide residues have been discussed briefly also. Special attention has been paid on the separation and detection of enantiomeric pesticide compounds. Expectation on the applications of CE and CEC is also outlined.
毛细管电泳(CE)和毛细管电色谱(CEC)具有一些突出的优点,如样品消耗量少和分离效率高。再结合不同的检测模式,如紫外检测、激光诱导荧光、安培法、电导法、质谱法以及各种样品预富集方法,CE和CEC在农药残留检测中已被越来越多的分析人员所接受。本综述着重比较了农药残留检测中各种检测模式的优缺点。同时也简要讨论了农药残留的预富集方法。特别关注了对映体农药化合物的分离和检测。还概述了对CE和CEC应用的展望。