Suppr超能文献

塞尔丁格上市后观察性研究:抗精神病药物治疗安全性的调查。

The European post-marketing observational sertindole study: an investigation of the safety of antipsychotic drug treatment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Feb;260(1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s00406-009-0018-0. Epub 2009 May 20.

Abstract

The objective of the European Post-marketing Observational Serdolect((R)) (EPOS) Study was to compare the safety of treatment with Serdolect (sertindole) with that of usual treatment in patients with schizophrenia, in normal European clinical practice. The EPOS was a multicentre, multinational, referenced, cohort study. Patients were enrolled at 226 centres in ten European countries. The study was prematurely terminated in 1998 as a result of the temporary market suspension of sertindole. Termination of the study reduced the number of patients recruited from the planned 12,000 to 2,321. While the power of the study was weakened, it did provide useful mortality information, which may be useful for future long-term studies. Crude mortality in the sertindole and non-sertindole groups was 1.45 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.53-3.16) and 1.50 (CI 0.72-2.76) deaths/100 patient-years exposed, respectively. There were no more cardiac deaths in the sertindole group than in the non-sertindole group. QT interval prolongation did not translate into an increased risk of death. Sertindole was well tolerated and caused few extrapyramidal symptoms. Although CIs remained large, this post-marketing study does not provide any evidence against the use of sertindole under normal conditions. Sertindole was well tolerated and posed no significant safety problems.

摘要

目的 欧洲上市后观察性 Serdolect((R))(EPOS)研究的目的是比较在正常欧洲临床实践中,精神分裂症患者使用 Serdolect(舍吲哚)治疗与常规治疗的安全性。EPOS 是一项多中心、多国、参照性、队列研究。患者在 10 个欧洲国家的 226 个中心入组。由于舍吲哚的临时市场暂停,该研究于 1998 年提前终止。研究的终止减少了从计划的 12000 名患者招募到 2321 名患者。尽管研究的效力减弱了,但它确实提供了有用的死亡率信息,这可能对未来的长期研究有用。舍吲哚组和非舍吲哚组的粗死亡率分别为 1.45(95%置信区间,CI 0.53-3.16)和 1.50(CI 0.72-2.76)/100 患者-年暴露。舍吲哚组的心脏死亡人数不比非舍吲哚组多。QT 间期延长并未转化为死亡风险增加。舍吲哚耐受性良好,很少引起锥体外系症状。尽管置信区间仍然较大,但这项上市后研究没有提供任何证据表明在正常情况下不能使用舍吲哚。舍吲哚耐受性良好,没有出现重大安全问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验