Campbell Marlissa A, Golub Mari S, Iyer Poorni, Kaufman Farla L, Li Ling-Hong, Moran Messen Francisco, Morgan James E, Donald James M
Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Branch, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland and Sacramento, 94612, USA.
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2009 Jun;86(3):157-75. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20196.
In developmental and reproductive toxicity studies, drinking water is a common means of delivering the test agent. Reduced consumption of toxicant-containing water raises questions about indirect effects of reduced maternal fluid consumption resulting from unpalatability, versus direct effects of the test compound. Issues to consider include: objective assessment of dehydration and thirst, the relative contributions of innate and learned behaviors to drinking behavior and flavor preference, and the objective assessment of physiologic stress. Not only do lab animals under ad lib conditions consume more water than the minimum required to maintain fluid balance, animals faced with water restriction have substantial physiologic capacity for protection of metabolic processes. Measures of blood biochemistry can provide quantifiable, objective indications of fluid balance, but changes in these parameters could result from other causes such as effects of a test toxicant. Consummatory behaviors in response to perceived need are highly influenced by learning. Hence, the drinking behavior, water intake, and flavor acceptance/preference of animals used in toxicology experiments could be subject to learning experiences with the test compound. Physiological symptoms of stress produced by water deprivation may be distinguishable from the symptoms associated with other generalized stressors, such as food deprivation, but doing so may be beyond the scope of most developmental or reproductive toxicity studies. Use of concurrent controls, paired to test groups for water consumption, could help distinguish between the direct effects of a test toxicant as opposed to effects of reduced water consumption alone.
在发育和生殖毒性研究中,饮用水是给予受试物的常用途径。含毒水的消耗量减少引发了一些问题,即不可口性导致母体液体摄入量减少的间接影响,与受试化合物的直接影响相比。需要考虑的问题包括:脱水和口渴的客观评估、先天行为和习得行为对饮水行为和口味偏好的相对贡献,以及生理应激的客观评估。不仅自由采食条件下的实验动物消耗的水量超过维持液体平衡所需的最低量,面临限水的动物在保护代谢过程方面也具有相当大的生理能力。血液生化指标可以提供液体平衡的可量化、客观指标,但这些参数的变化可能由其他原因引起,如受试毒物的影响。对感知需求的 consummatory 行为(此处 consummatory 行为可理解为满足需求的行为,如饮水行为等)受学习的影响很大。因此,毒理学实验中使用的动物的饮水行为、饮水量以及口味接受度/偏好可能会受到与受试化合物的学习经历的影响。缺水产生的应激生理症状可能与其他全身性应激源(如食物缺乏)相关的症状有所不同,但这样做可能超出了大多数发育或生殖毒性研究的范围。使用与测试组配对以比较耗水量的同期对照,有助于区分受试毒物的直接影响与仅饮水减少的影响。