Qiao Yan, Ma Changsheng, Nie Shaoping, Liu Xiaohui, Kang Junping, Lv Qiang, Du Xin, Hu Rong, Zhang Yin, Jia Changqi, Liu Xinmin, Dong Jianzeng, Chen Fang, Zhou Yujie, Lv Shuzheng, Huang Fangjiong, Gu Chengxiong, Wu Xuesi
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Clin Cardiol. 2009 Aug;32(8):E24-30. doi: 10.1002/clc.20413.
Studies comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of diabetic patients with multivessel disease are relatively scarce although controversies exist concerning the relative efficacy of CABG versus DES.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in diabetic patients with multivessel disease compared with CABG.
We included 645 consecutive diabetic patients who underwent either CABG (n = 282) or DES implantation (n = 363) in our institution from July 2003 to December 2005.
At 12 mo after index revascularization procedure, the total mortality rate was similar in the CABG and DES group (3.2% versus 3.0%, hazard ratio [HR] of CABG versus percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14 to 2.45, p = 0.460), but the rate of major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events was lower in the CABG group (7.8% versus 17.9%, HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.37, p < 0.001) mainly due to less repeat revascularization with CABG (1.4% versus 11.6%, HR: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.13, p < 0.001). Age, 3-vessel disease, and serum creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dl were positive independent predictors of 12 mo death.
At 12 mo, CABG was associated with less adverse events primarily due to less repeat revascularization compared with DES although there was no significant difference in mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) rates between the 2 groups; high repeat revascularization rate related to DES resulted from high restenosis rate in diabetic patients and lower rate of complete revascularization offered by PCI.
尽管冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗多支血管病变糖尿病患者的相对疗效存在争议,但相关研究相对较少。
本研究旨在评估与CABG相比,药物洗脱支架(DES)植入术对多支血管病变糖尿病患者的疗效。
我们纳入了2003年7月至2005年12月在我院连续接受CABG(n = 282)或DES植入术(n = 363)的645例糖尿病患者。
在首次血运重建术后12个月时,CABG组和DES组的总死亡率相似(3.2%对3.0%,CABG与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗[PCI]的风险比[HR]为0.58,95%置信区间[CI]:0.14至2.45,p = 0.460),但CABG组的主要不良心脑血管事件发生率较低(7.8%对17.9%,HR:0.15,95%CI:0.06至0.37,p < 0.001),主要原因是CABG的再次血运重建较少(1.4%对11.6%,HR:0.02,95%CI:0.01至0.13,p < 0.001)。年龄、三支血管病变和血清肌酐≥1.5mg/dl是12个月死亡的阳性独立预测因素。
在12个月时,与DES相比,CABG相关不良事件较少,主要原因是再次血运重建较少,尽管两组之间的死亡率和心肌梗死(MI)率无显著差异;DES相关的高再次血运重建率是由于糖尿病患者再狭窄率高以及PCI提供的完全血运重建率较低所致。